KWIN ranks 1st and SCA 60th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs SCA
KWIN −0.67pt a year
0.51%1.18%
KWIN 4.0×the volume
14.3K3.55K
KWIN vs SCA Performance
+0.8%+13.9%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- SCA 1.18%
- KWIN $64M
- SCA $4M
- KWIN +3.7%
- SCA
- KWIN 55
- SCA 1
- KWIN 14.3K sh, better
- SCA 3.55K sh
- KWIN $25.93
- SCA $23.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | SCA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F19 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A87Higher | B65 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | D27 |
| Holdings | B65 | |
| Durability | B68Higher | C41 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and SCA are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
SCAD
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
SCA Autocallables have mostly lived inside bank-issued structured notes. SCA puts that payoff on Super Micro Computer in an ETF wrapper: a laddered book of contracts with coupon barriers, early-call triggers and limited downside protection, priced and traded daily.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
SCA The Fund seeks to generate income through a portfolio of autocallable instruments linked to Super Micro Computer, Inc., with limited downside protection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs SCA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs SCA Cost
Overpaying SCA vs KWIN
$11,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
SCA 1.18%
$21,543
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | SCA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $2,065 | $1,147 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $7,697 | $4,170 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $21,543 | $11,378 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 1.18%SCA
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
SCA 48th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs SCA Dividends
- KWIN None
- SCA
- KWIN
- SCA $0.78
- KWIN
- SCA Oct 7, 2026
- KWIN
- SCA Oct 9, 2026
- KWIN
- SCA Monthly
Distribution history
KWIN vs SCA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Worst fall
- KWIN −1.6%SCA
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001SCA 1.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.