ACYQ ranks 2nd and XOMO 30th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
ACYQ vs XOMO
0.0%by weight
ACYQ −0.42pt a year
0.75%1.17%
ACYQ 1.8×the volume
98K55.1K
ACYQ vs XOMO Performance
+6.6%+10.7%
- ACYQ 0.75%, better
- XOMO 1.17%
- ACYQ $102M
- XOMO $41M
- ACYQ
- XOMO +37.1%
- ACYQ
- XOMO 36.24%
- ACYQ 7
- XOMO 9
- ACYQ 98K sh, better
- XOMO 55.1K sh
- ACYQ $20.20
- XOMO $11.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACYQ | XOMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D35 |
| Mission | C50 | |
| Risk | A96Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | B55 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66 | A79Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. ACYQ and XOMO are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACYQA
XOMOC
In short
XOMO XOMO points YieldMax's premium-harvesting machinery at an oil major, selling call spreads on Exxon Mobil rather than plain covered calls, aiming to bank option income while leaving room to ride part of XOM's move higher.
Stated mandate
XOMO The fund is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Exxon Mobil Corp. It seeks to harvest option premiums while retaining some participation in Exxon Mobil's share-price appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACYQ vs XOMO Holdings
How ACYQ and XOMO differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ACYQ and 0.0% of XOMO.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ACYQ and XOMO.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ACYQ.
Concentration
- ACYQ100.0%
- XOMO102.6%
- ACYQ6
- XOMO9
Asset class
- ACYQ
- Multi-Asset
- XOMO
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in ACYQ6
- In both0
- Only in XOMO9
Only in ACYQ
6 securities, 98.4% of ACYQ by weight
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/202633.26%
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/31/202632.26%
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/202631.90%
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/28/20270.64%
- ACYQ Autocall Derivative JPMorgan0.18%
- ACYQ Autocall Derivative BNP0.13%
Only in XOMO
9 securities, 100% of XOMO by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 07/08/202735.41%
- Xom 12/18/2026 155.01 C18.65%
- United States Treasury Bill 02/18/202717.47%
- United States Treasury Bill 12/10/202617.45%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/202711.50%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/20271.51%
- Xom Us 11/06/26 C1950.35%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.14%
- Xom Us 11/06/26 C192.50.10%
Weight gaps
ACYQ and XOMO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACYQ vs XOMO Cost
Overpaying XOMO vs ACYQ
$6,906
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACYQ 0.75%
$14,482
XOMO 1.17%
$21,388
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACYQ | XOMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $2,048 | $712 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $7,639 | $2,561 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $21,388 | $6,906 |
- 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
- 1.17%XOMO
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds
XOMO 46th cheapest of 71 funds
ACYQ vs XOMO Dividends
- ACYQ
- XOMO 36.24%
- ACYQ
- XOMO $4.10
- ACYQ $0.39
- XOMO $0.09
- ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
- XOMO Oct 29, 2026
- ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
- XOMO Oct 30, 2026
- ACYQ Monthly
- XOMO Weekly
Distribution history
ACYQ vs XOMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACYQ XOMO 17.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACYQ XOMO 0.63
- Worst fall
- ACYQ XOMO −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ACYQ 1.82XOMO −0.29
ACYQ and XOMO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.17% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

