BKEM ranks 3rd and AFK 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
AFK vs BKEM
BKEM −0.65pt a year
0.76%0.11%
AFK 4.0×the volume
61.3K15.4K
BKEM +0.6pt
+5.7%+6.3%
AFK vs BKEM Performance
+32.1%+35.8%
- AFK 0.76%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- AFK $92M
- BKEM $101M
- AFK +6.8%
- BKEM +12.7%, better
- AFK 1.07%
- BKEM 1.25%, better
- AFK 79
- BKEM 1805
- AFK 61.3K sh, better
- BKEM 15.4K sh
- AFK $25.52
- BKEM $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFK | BKEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A95Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D34 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | B55Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | D38 | |
| Durability | B63Higher | C48 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. AFK and BKEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFKD
BKEMA
In short
AFK Africa barely registers inside a standard emerging-markets fund. AFK makes it the whole trip: a 2008-vintage index fund holding roughly 80 African companies and tracking the MVIS GDP Africa Index.
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
Stated mandate
AFK The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS® GDP Africa Index.
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFK vs BKEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFK vs BKEM Cost
Overpaying AFK vs BKEM
$12,343
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFK 0.76%
$14,656
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFK | BKEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $201 | $1,152 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $788 | $4,354 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $2,313 | $12,343 |
- 0.76%AFK
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
AFK 19th cheapest of 20 funds
AFK vs BKEM Dividends
- AFK 1.07%
- BKEM 1.25%, better
- AFK $0.27
- BKEM $0.35
- AFK $0.27
- BKEM $0.28
- AFK Dec 22, 2025
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- AFK Dec 26, 2025
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- AFK Irregular
- BKEM Twice a year
Distribution history
AFK vs BKEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AFK
- BKEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFK 20.1%BKEM 16.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AFK 1.02, betterBKEM 0.98
- Worst fall
- AFK −37.6%BKEM −31.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AFK 1.12BKEM 1.12Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
AFK and BKEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
