XSOE ranks 4th and AFK 17th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
AFK vs XSOE
XSOE −0.44pt a year
0.76%0.32%
XSOE 1.6×the volume
61.3K97K
XSOE +2.9pt
+5.0%+7.9%
AFK vs XSOE Performance
+32.1%+22.0%
- AFK 0.76%
- XSOE 0.32%, better
- AFK $92M
- XSOE $1.91B
- AFK +6.8%
- XSOE +10.5%, better
- AFK 1.07%
- XSOE 1.82%, better
- AFK 79
- XSOE 866
- AFK 61.3K sh
- XSOE 97K sh, better
- AFK $25.52
- XSOE $43.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFK | XSOE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A71Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D34 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | B55Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | D38 | B59Higher |
| Durability | B63 | A81Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. AFK and XSOE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFKD
XSOEA
In short
AFK Africa barely registers inside a standard emerging-markets fund. AFK makes it the whole trip: a 2008-vintage index fund holding roughly 80 African companies and tracking the MVIS GDP Africa Index.
XSOE One screen, applied hard: if a government owns more than 20% of a company, XSOE leaves it out. What is left is emerging markets minus the state champions, with country weights pushed back toward the standard EM mix.
Stated mandate
AFK The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the MVIS® GDP Africa Index.
XSOE The fund seeks to track the investment results of emerging-market companies that are not state-owned enterprises, defined as companies with no more than 20% government ownership.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFK vs XSOE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFK vs XSOE Cost
Overpaying AFK vs XSOE
$8,114
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFK 0.76%
$14,656
XSOE 0.32%
$6,542
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFK | XSOE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $580 | $773 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $2,250 | $2,892 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $6,542 | $8,114 |
- 0.76%AFK
- 0.32%XSOE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XSOE 6th cheapest of 20 funds
AFK 19th cheapest of 20 funds
AFK vs XSOE Dividends
- AFK 1.07%
- XSOE 1.82%, better
- AFK $0.27
- XSOE $0.78
- AFK $0.27
- XSOE $0.22
- AFK Dec 22, 2025
- XSOE Sep 25, 2026
- AFK Dec 26, 2025
- XSOE Sep 29, 2026
- AFK Irregular
- XSOE Quarterly
Distribution history
AFK vs XSOE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AFK
- XSOE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFK 20.1%XSOE 17.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AFK 1.02, betterXSOE 0.90
- Worst fall
- AFK −37.6%XSOE −37.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AFK 1.12XSOE 1.18
AFK and XSOE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
