ILCV ranks 2nd and AFLG 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
AFLG vs ILCV
ILCV −0.51pt a year
0.55%0.04%
AFLG 4.5×the volume
110K24.4K
ILCV +0.9pt
+11.7%+12.6%
AFLG vs ILCV Performance
+73.8%+81.1%
- AFLG 0.55%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- AFLG $920M
- ILCV $1.37B
- AFLG +14.1%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- AFLG 0.71%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- AFLG 216
- ILCV 375
- AFLG 110K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- AFLG $44.25
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFLG | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A82Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | B64 |
| Holdings | C41Higher | D39 |
| Durability | B60 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. AFLG and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFLGC
ILCVA
In short
AFLG Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one US large-cap portfolio, run by an active manager tuning risk against the S&P 500 instead of following a frozen index recipe. Roughly 250 names.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
AFLG The fund seeks capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in U.S.-listed equity securities of large-capitalization companies and uses active risk management with a quantitative multi-factor approach.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFLG vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFLG vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying AFLG vs ILCV
$10,055
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFLG 0.55%
$10,904
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFLG | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $73 | $915 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $288 | $3,502 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $849 | $10,055 |
- 0.55%AFLG
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
AFLG 77th cheapest of 99 funds
AFLG vs ILCV Dividends
- AFLG 0.71%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- AFLG $0.31
- ILCV $1.65
- AFLG $0.02
- ILCV $0.42
- AFLG Sep 24, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- AFLG Sep 30, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- AFLG Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
AFLG vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AFLG
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFLG 12.0%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AFLG 1.46ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- AFLG −23.5%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AFLG 0.94ILCV 0.82
AFLG and ILCV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
