VONV ranks 1st and AFLG 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
AFLG vs VONV
VONV −0.49pt a year
0.55%0.06%
VONV 7.1×the volume
110K774K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+11.7%+11.7%
AFLG vs VONV Performance
+73.8%+73.8%
- AFLG 0.55%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- AFLG $920M
- VONV $23.3B
- AFLG +14.1%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- AFLG 0.71%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- AFLG 216
- VONV 873
- AFLG 110K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- AFLG $44.25
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFLG | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B65 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | C41 | C49Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. AFLG and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFLGC
VONVA
In short
AFLG Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one US large-cap portfolio, run by an active manager tuning risk against the S&P 500 instead of following a frozen index recipe. Roughly 250 names.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
AFLG The fund seeks capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in U.S.-listed equity securities of large-capitalization companies and uses active risk management with a quantitative multi-factor approach.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFLG vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFLG vs VONV Cost
Overpaying AFLG vs VONV
$9,634
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFLG 0.55%
$10,904
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFLG | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $110 | $878 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $432 | $3,358 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $1,270 | $9,634 |
- 0.55%AFLG
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
AFLG 77th cheapest of 99 funds
AFLG vs VONV Dividends
- AFLG 0.71%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- AFLG $0.31
- VONV $1.74
- AFLG $0.02
- VONV $0.42
- AFLG Sep 24, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- AFLG Sep 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- AFLG Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
AFLG vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AFLG
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFLG 12.0%, betterVONV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AFLG 1.46, betterVONV 1.43
- Worst fall
- AFLG −23.5%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AFLG 0.94VONV 0.85
AFLG and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


