VYM ranks 2nd and AFLG 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
AFLG vs VYM
VYM −0.51pt a year
0.55%0.04%
VYM 10.4×the volume
110K1.14M
VYM +0.1pt
+11.7%+11.8%
AFLG vs VYM Performance
+73.8%+74.3%
- AFLG 0.55%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- AFLG $920M
- VYM $95.8B
- AFLG +14.1%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- AFLG 0.71%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- AFLG 216
- VYM 601
- AFLG 110K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- AFLG $44.25
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AFLG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F22 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A79 | A79 |
| Risk | B65 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | C41 | C53Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. AFLG and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AFLGC
VYMA
In short
AFLG Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) blended into one US large-cap portfolio, run by an active manager tuning risk against the S&P 500 instead of following a frozen index recipe. Roughly 250 names.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
AFLG The fund seeks capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in U.S.-listed equity securities of large-capitalization companies and uses active risk management with a quantitative multi-factor approach.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AFLG vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AFLG vs VYM Cost
Overpaying AFLG vs VYM
$10,055
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AFLG 0.55%
$10,904
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AFLG | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $73 | $915 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $288 | $3,502 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $849 | $10,055 |
- 0.55%AFLG
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
AFLG 77th cheapest of 99 funds
AFLG vs VYM Dividends
- AFLG 0.71%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- AFLG $0.31
- VYM $3.68
- AFLG $0.02
- VYM $0.89
- AFLG Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- AFLG Sep 30, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- AFLG Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
AFLG vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AFLG
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AFLG 12.0%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AFLG 1.46, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- AFLG −23.5%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AFLG 0.94VYM 0.75
AFLG and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




