AGG ranks 1st and NUAG 30th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGG vs NUAG
AGG −0.13pt a year
0.03%0.16%
AGG 306.3×the volume
9.95M32.5K
NUAG +0.2pt
+1.4%+1.6%
AGG vs NUAG Performance
−0.9%+0.5%
- AGG 0.03%, better
- NUAG 0.16%
- AGG $140B
- NUAG $131M
- AGG −0.2%, better
- NUAG −0.4%
- AGG 4.12%
- NUAG 4.60%, better
- AGG 13428
- NUAG 1569
- AGG 9.95M sh, better
- NUAG 32.5K sh
- AGG $96.45
- NUAG $20.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGG | NUAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D36 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B67 |
| Durability | A95Higher | B59 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGG and NUAG are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGA
NUAGA
In short
AGG Launched in 2003, one of the first funds to pack the entire U.S. investment-grade bond market into a single ticker: Treasuries, corporates and mortgage bonds, three basis points a year, cash paid monthly.
NUAG The Agg, re-sorted for income. NUAG tracks an ICE BofA index that takes the same investment-grade universe and tilts weight toward its higher-yielding corners, with rules fencing in how far duration and credit quality can drift. Fee: 0.16%.
Stated mandate
AGG The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, providing broad exposure to the total U.S. investment-grade bond market.
NUAG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the ICE BofA Enhanced Yield U.S. Broad Bond Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGG vs NUAG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGG vs NUAG Cost
Overpaying NUAG vs AGG
$2,704
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGG 0.03%
$638
NUAG 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGG | NUAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $292 | $237 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,141 | $925 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,342 | $2,704 |
- 0.03%AGG, cheaper
- 0.16%NUAG
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
AGG 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
NUAG 27th cheapest of 114 funds
AGG vs NUAG Dividends
- AGG 4.12%
- NUAG 4.60%, better
- AGG $3.97
- NUAG $0.93
- AGG $0.33
- NUAG $0.08
- AGG Oct 1, 2026
- NUAG Oct 1, 2026
- AGG Oct 6, 2026
- NUAG Oct 2, 2026
- AGG Monthly
- NUAG Monthly
Distribution history
AGG vs NUAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AGG
- NUAG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGG 5.6%, betterNUAG 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGG 0.17NUAG 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- AGG −17.3%, betterNUAG −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AGG 0.99NUAG 0.99Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
AGG and NUAG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





