SCHZ ranks 2nd and AGGH 93rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGGH vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.40pt a year
0.43%0.03%
SCHZ 7.0×the volume
337K2.37M
AGGH +0.2pt
+5.6%+5.4%
AGGH vs SCHZ Performance
−0.2%−0.2%
- AGGH 0.43%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- AGGH $416M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- AGGH −0.2%
- SCHZ −0.2%
- AGGH 7.63%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- AGGH 9
- SCHZ 12610
- AGGH 337K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- AGGH $19.21
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGGH | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D35 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | F16 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGGH and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGHC
SCHZA
In short
AGGH Core bonds with a twist: an investment-grade bond core built mostly from other ETFs, then options layered on top to hedge risk or generate income. The active take on the Agg, for people who find the index version too plain.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
AGGH The Fund seeks to maximize total return. It invests primarily in investment-grade bonds, chiefly through exchange-traded funds, and uses derivative overlays to hedge risk or generate income.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGGH vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGGH vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying AGGH vs SCHZ
$8,024
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGGH 0.43%
$8,662
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGGH | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $776 | $55 | $721 |
| 20 | $2,994 | $216 | $2,778 |
| 30 | $8,662 | $638 | $8,024 |
- 0.43%AGGH
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
AGGH 82nd cheapest of 114 funds
AGGH vs SCHZ Dividends
- AGGH 7.63%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- AGGH $1.47
- SCHZ $0.96
- AGGH $0.12
- SCHZ $0.08
- AGGH Oct 27, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- AGGH Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- AGGH Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
AGGH vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGGH 7.2%SCHZ 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AGGH 0.17SCHZ 0.17Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- AGGH −13.2%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AGGH 1.12SCHZ 0.99
AGGH and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

