QTUM ranks 2nd and AGIQ 17th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
AGIQ vs QTUM
QTUM −0.29pt a year
0.69%0.40%
QTUM 69.5×the volume
5.17K359K
AGIQ vs QTUM Performance
+3.6%+12.9%
- AGIQ 0.69%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- AGIQ $11M
- QTUM $4.59B
- AGIQ +3.6%
- QTUM +12.9%, better
- AGIQ
- QTUM 1.14%
- AGIQ 26
- QTUM 89
- AGIQ 5.17K sh
- QTUM 359K sh, better
- AGIQ $23.33
- QTUM $123.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGIQ | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A83Higher | A73 |
| Risk | A72Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | C52 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | A92Higher |
| Durability | D37 | A79Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. AGIQ and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGIQC
QTUMA
In short
AGIQ Most AI funds buy the whole theme. AGIQ narrows it to agentic AI, the systems built to take actions rather than just answer, tracking a BITA index of US-listed companies drawing significant revenue from it. Young, small, and unusually specific.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
AGIQ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the BITA US Agentic AI Select Index, which targets U.S.-listed companies obtaining significant revenue from agentic artificial intelligence.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGIQ vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGIQ vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying AGIQ vs QTUM
$5,339
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGIQ 0.69%
$13,429
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGIQ | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $723 | $509 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $2,793 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $8,090 | $5,339 |
- 0.69%AGIQ
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
AGIQ 20th cheapest of 30 funds
AGIQ vs QTUM Dividends
- AGIQ
- QTUM 1.14%
- AGIQ
- QTUM $1.40
- AGIQ $0.37
- QTUM $0.46
- AGIQ Jun 29, 2026
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- AGIQ Jun 30, 2026
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- AGIQ Twice a year
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
AGIQ vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGIQ 25.5%QTUM 28.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGIQ 0.48QTUM 1.30
- Worst fall
- AGIQ −19.7%QTUM −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AGIQ 1.54QTUM 1.67
AGIQ and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




