QTUM ranks 1st and BAI 5th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
BAI vs QTUM
QTUM −0.15pt a year
0.55%0.40%
BAI 10.1×the volume
3.67M362K
BAI vs QTUM Performance
+6.7%+17.5%
- BAI 0.55%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- BAI $12.2B
- QTUM $5.06B
- BAI +6.7%
- QTUM +17.5%, better
- BAI 1.51%, better
- QTUM 1.05%
- BAI 53
- QTUM 89
- BAI 3.67M sh, better
- QTUM 362K sh
- BAI $39.25
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAI | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A74 | A86Higher |
| Mission | D30 | A74Higher |
| Risk | D28 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | B65 | A91Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A79 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. BAI and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAIB
QTUMA
In short
BAI BlackRock's hands-on answer to AI index funds: about 50 global names chosen across the AI tech stack, from infrastructure to the apps on top. Fee is 0.55% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028, below the typical AI thematic fund.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
BAI The fund seeks active exposure to companies enabling, developing, and deploying advanced artificial-intelligence technologies across infrastructure, intelligence, and applications and services.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAI vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAI vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying BAI vs QTUM
$2,814
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAI 0.55%
$10,904
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAI | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $723 | $265 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $2,793 | $997 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $8,090 | $2,814 |
- 0.55%BAI
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
BAI 8th cheapest of 30 funds
BAI vs QTUM Dividends
- BAI 1.51%, better
- QTUM 1.05%
- BAI $0.59
- QTUM $1.40
- BAI $0.59
- QTUM $0.46
- BAI Dec 16, 2025
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- BAI Dec 19, 2025
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- BAI Twice a year
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
BAI vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAI 39.4%QTUM 28.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAI 0.71QTUM 1.30
- Worst fall
- BAI −34.1%QTUM −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BAI 2.33QTUM 1.67
BAI and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




