QTUM ranks 1st and ARTY 3rd of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
ARTY vs QTUM
QTUM −0.07pt a year
0.47%0.40%
ARTY 1.4×the volume
497K362K
QTUM +11.8pt
+9.7%+21.5%
ARTY vs QTUM Performance
+58.9%+164.9%
- ARTY 0.47%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- ARTY $3.65B
- QTUM $5.06B
- ARTY +33.9%, better
- QTUM +17.5%
- ARTY 0.06%
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- ARTY 65
- QTUM 89
- ARTY 497K sh, better
- QTUM 362K sh
- ARTY $68.50
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARTY | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | C47 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A70 |
| Holdings | B69 | A91Higher |
| Durability | A91Higher | A79 |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. ARTY and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARTYA
QTUMA
In short
ARTY Launched in 2018 as a robotics fund, ARTY switched benchmarks in 2024 and came back as a focused global AI portfolio: about 50 companies across chips, data centers, software and services, at a below-median theme fee.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
ARTY The fund seeks to track a global index of companies contributing to artificial-intelligence technologies across software, infrastructure, and services.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARTY vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARTY vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying ARTY vs QTUM
$1,328
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARTY 0.47%
$9,418
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARTY | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $847 | $723 | $124 |
| 20 | $3,261 | $2,793 | $468 |
| 30 | $9,418 | $8,090 | $1,328 |
- 0.47%ARTY
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
ARTY 6th cheapest of 30 funds
ARTY vs QTUM Dividends
- ARTY 0.06%
- QTUM 1.05%, better
- ARTY $0.04
- QTUM $1.40
- ARTY $0.04
- QTUM $0.46
- ARTY Jun 15, 2026
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- ARTY Jun 18, 2026
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- ARTY Annual
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
ARTY vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ARTY
- QTUM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARTY 32.7%QTUM 28.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ARTY 0.92QTUM 1.30, better
- Worst fall
- ARTY −50.5%QTUM −38.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ARTY 2.06QTUM 1.67
ARTY and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.47% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




