RING ranks 1st and AGMI 5th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
AGMI vs RING
AGMI −0.04pt a year
0.35%0.39%
RING 508.4×the volume
1.28K649K
AGMI vs RING Performance
+15.7%+10.3%
- AGMI 0.35%, better
- RING 0.39%
- AGMI $8M
- RING $2.06B
- AGMI +15.7%, better
- RING +10.3%
- AGMI 4.93%, better
- RING 1.35%
- AGMI 52
- RING 49
- AGMI 1.28K sh
- RING 649K sh, better
- AGMI $58.06
- RING $67.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGMI | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A79 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | F19 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | C47Higher | F22 |
| Durability | F17 | A81Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. AGMI and RING are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGMIB
RINGB
In short
AGMI Most "precious metals miners" funds are gold funds with a silver garnish. AGMI is the straight shot: an index of about 40 global silver miners, run at 0.35% a year, under what the category typically charges.
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
Stated mandate
AGMI The Fund is designed to follow an index of companies materially exposed to silver mining, with returns pursued before fees and expenses.
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGMI vs RING Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGMI vs RING Cost
Overpaying RING vs AGMI
$772
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGMI 0.35%
$7,126
RING 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGMI | RING | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $705 | $71 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,725 | $271 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $7,898 | $772 |
- 0.35%AGMI, cheaper
- 0.39%RING
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
AGMI cheapest of 18 funds
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
AGMI vs RING Dividends
- AGMI 4.93%, better
- RING 1.35%
- AGMI $2.86
- RING $0.90
- AGMI $2.86
- RING $0.53
- AGMI Dec 18, 2025
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- AGMI Dec 19, 2025
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- AGMI Irregular
- RING Twice a year
Distribution history
AGMI vs RING Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGMI 45.9%RING 42.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGMI 0.84RING 1.01
- Worst fall
- AGMI −35.7%RING −47.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AGMI 0.54RING 0.94
AGMI and RING in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


