Skip to content

RING vs SLVP

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

RINGBNasdaq

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

SLVPBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

RING0.39%SLVP0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

RING 2.6×the volume

RING649KSLVP253K

10Y return · a year

RING +4.0pt

RING+14.1%SLVP+10.1%

RING vs SLVP Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+179.8%RING+123.1%SLVP

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. RING +179.8%. SLVP +123.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%300%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
RING 0.39%
SLVP 0.39%
Fund size
RING $2.06B
SLVP $730M
1Y total return
RING +10.3%
SLVP +11.4%, better
Yield (12M)
RING 1.35%
SLVP 2.43%, better
Holdings
RING 49
SLVP 47
Avg volume (30D)
RING 649K sh, better
SLVP 253K sh
NAV per share
RING $67.07
SLVP $28.98
52W range

ETF.net Grade

RING: Cost 79, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 22, Durability 81. SLVP: Cost 79, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 75, Holdings 21, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for RING, SLVP, with each pillar’s weight
PillarRINGSLVP
Cost30% weightA79A79
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66HigherC53
Tradability15% weightA72A75Higher
Holdings10% weightF22HigherF21
Durability5% weightA81HigherA79

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. RING and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

RING ranks 1st and SLVP 3rd of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BGDXVanEck Gold Miners ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 3BSLVPiShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

RINGBiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

SLVPBiShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

In short

RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.

SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.

Stated mandate

RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.

SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.

Why people hold it

  • RING At 0.39% a year it charges less than the typical gold-miner fund, and less than VanEck's GDX and GDXJ, the category's best-known names.ishares.com
  • Pure play by design: the index targets companies primarily in the business of gold mining, so you get miners rather than a mixed metals-and-materials basket.ishares.com
  • The mandate is global, not US-only, so the portfolio can reach gold producers listed across developed and emerging markets.ishares.com
  • Live since 2012, a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest builds in its precious-metals miner peer group.
  • SLVP 0.39% a year undercuts the 0.52% median for precious-metals miner funds, and matches the fee on the iShares gold-miner sibling, RING.
  • Global mandate, not a US-listing screen: the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners IMI covers worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
  • Trading since 2012, one of the longer-running silver miner funds on the shelf, and it stands among the stronger implementations in its precious-metals mining peer group.

Worth knowing

  • RING Roughly 40 stocks in a single industry. The largest miners carry real weight, so one company's bad quarter is felt across the fund.ishares.com
  • This is mining equity, not bullion. Alongside the gold price you take on company execution, mine geology, labor and country risk.ishares.com
  • Income is an afterthought here: distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly.
  • SLVP Roughly 40 stocks, so individual miners carry real weight and the whole basket keys off one metal's fortunes.
  • "And Metals Miners" is doing work in the name: the mandate covers silver exploration or metals mining, so diversified miners can sit beside pure silver plays.
  • Not the cheapest silver miner ticket: AGMI lists at 0.35%, though it lacks SLVP's record back to 2012.

Full RING profile⁠

Full SLVP profile⁠

RING vs SLVP Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

RING vs SLVP Cost

Same expense ratio

$7,898

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • RING 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SLVP 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • RING 0.39%
  • SLVP 0.39%
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RING $7,898SLVP $7,898

Year by year

YearRINGSLVP
10$705$705
20$2,725$2,725
30$7,898$7,898

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%RING
  • 0.39%SLVP
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds

SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds

RING vs SLVP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
RING 1.35%
SLVP 2.43%, better
Payout (12M)
RING $0.90
SLVP $0.70
Last payment
RING $0.53
SLVP $0.14
Ex-dividend
RING Jun 15, 2026
SLVP Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
RING Jun 18, 2026
SLVP Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
RING Twice a year
SLVP Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

RINGTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll RING payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.03; Dec 19, 2017 $0.05; Jun 19, 2018 $0.07; Dec 18, 2018 $0.04; Jun 17, 2019 $0.14; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Jun 15, 2020 $0.10; Dec 14, 2020 $0.14; Jun 10, 2021 $0.31; Dec 13, 2021 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.23; Dec 13, 2022 $0.28; Jun 7, 2023 $0.21; Dec 20, 2023 $0.28; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Jun 16, 2025 $0.24; Dec 16, 2025 $0.38; Jun 15, 2026 $0.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SLVPTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll SLVP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.06; Dec 19, 2017 $0.03; Jun 19, 2018 $0.06; Dec 18, 2018 $0.05; Jun 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 16, 2019 $0.19; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Dec 14, 2020 $0.39; Jun 10, 2021 $0.15; Dec 13, 2021 $0.06; Jun 9, 2022 $0.06; Dec 13, 2022 $0.0096; Jun 7, 2023 $0.04; Dec 20, 2023 $0.05; Jun 11, 2024 $0.04; Dec 17, 2024 $0.08; Jun 16, 2025 $0.04; Dec 16, 2025 $0.57; Jun 15, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

RING vs SLVP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • RING
  • SLVP
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: RING −47.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
RING 42.3%, betterSLVP 49.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
RING 1.01, betterSLVP 1.00
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
RING −47.9%SLVP −47.7%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
RING 0.94SLVP 1.21

RING and SLVP in the news

Popular comparisons

  • RINGBvsSGDMB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVPBvsSGDMB

    iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsGDXB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVPBvsGDXB

    iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsAGMIB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Themes Silver Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SLVPBvsAGMIB

    iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF · Themes Silver Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.