RING ranks 1st and SLVP 3rd of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
RING vs SLVP
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.39%0.39%
RING 2.6×the volume
649K253K
RING +4.0pt
+14.1%+10.1%
RING vs SLVP Performance
+179.8%+123.1%
- RING 0.39%
- SLVP 0.39%
- RING $2.06B
- SLVP $730M
- RING +10.3%
- SLVP +11.4%, better
- RING 1.35%
- SLVP 2.43%, better
- RING 49
- SLVP 47
- RING 649K sh, better
- SLVP 253K sh
- RING $67.07
- SLVP $28.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | RING | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A79 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | A72 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | F22Higher | F21 |
| Durability | A81Higher | A79 |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. RING and SLVP are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
RINGB
SLVPB
In short
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
SLVP About 40 global silver and metals miners in one ticker, priced below the typical precious-metals miner fund. Running since 2012, and read the 'metals miners' part of the name: the index reaches past pure silver plays.
Stated mandate
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
SLVP The fund is designed to follow an index of worldwide companies whose principal business is silver exploration or metals mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
RING vs SLVP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
RING vs SLVP Cost
Same expense ratio
$7,898
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
RING 0.39%
$7,898
SLVP 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | RING | SLVP |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $705 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,725 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $7,898 |
- 0.39%RING
- 0.39%SLVP
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
SLVP 4th cheapest of 18 funds
RING vs SLVP Dividends
- RING 1.35%
- SLVP 2.43%, better
- RING $0.90
- SLVP $0.70
- RING $0.53
- SLVP $0.14
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- SLVP Jun 15, 2026
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- SLVP Jun 18, 2026
- RING Twice a year
- SLVP Twice a year
Distribution history
RING vs SLVP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- RING
- SLVP
Risk facts
- Volatility
- RING 42.3%, betterSLVP 49.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- RING 1.01, betterSLVP 1.00
- Worst fall
- RING −47.9%SLVP −47.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- RING 0.94SLVP 1.21
RING and SLVP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



