Skip to content
etf.net

AGNG vs GOLS

Global X Aging Population ETF

AGNGANasdaq

Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF

GOLSDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AGNG −0.40pt a year

AGNG0.50%GOLS0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

AGNG 2.4×the volume

AGNG10.3KGOLS4.39K

AGNG vs GOLS Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

+7.9%AGNG+3.8%GOLS

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. AGNG +7.9%. GOLS +3.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AGNG 0.50%, better
GOLS 0.90%
Fund size
AGNG $98M
GOLS $38M
1Y total return
AGNG +21.2%
GOLS No data
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.80%
GOLS No data
Holdings
AGNG 86
GOLS 45
Avg volume (30D)
AGNG 10.3K sh, better
GOLS 4.39K sh
NAV per share
AGNG $40.20
GOLS $27.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGNG: Cost 65, Risk 86, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 74, Durability 73. GOLS: Cost 0, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 39, Holdings 16, Durability 24.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGNG, GOLS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGNGGOLS
Cost30% weightB65HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA86HigherA81
Tradability15% weightB61HigherD39
Holdings10% weightA74HigherF16
Durability5% weightA73HigherF24

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGNG and GOLS are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AGNG ranks 2nd and GOLS 18th of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 69
  3. Rank 3BICOPiShares Copper and Metals Mining ETFScore 68
  4. Rank 17DCOPJSprott Junior Copper Miners ETFScore 33
  5. Rank 18DGOLSGabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETFScore 27

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGNGAGlobal X Aging Population ETF

GOLSDGabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF

In short

AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.

GOLS Concerts, stadiums, ticket stubs: GOLS packages the live and sports economy into one ticker. Gabelli launched it in 2026 as a narrow theme inside the communication services aisle, with a single stated goal of capital appreciation.

Stated mandate

AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.

GOLS The Fund seeks capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

  • AGNG One ticket on the demographics trade: roughly 80 developed-market companies tied to older consumers, tracking the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.50% a year, below the median fee in its global thematic peer group. Niche themes usually charge a premium for the privilege.
  • Running since 2016, so the theme has a long live record rather than a backtest and a pitch deck.
  • Portfolio construction and risk profile put it among the stronger builds in its global thematic peer group.
  • GOLS One ticker for the live economy: sports and live entertainment and the businesses around them, rather than the whole communication services sector.
  • Simple mandate. Capital appreciation from equities, with preferred shares as well as common stock available in the toolkit.
  • A specialist among peers built as broad sector index trackers (XLC, FCOM, VOX), so it covers ground those funds spread thin.

Worth knowing

  • AGNG Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mega-cap funds and how you place the order matters more.
  • One theme, tilted to healthcare and developed markets, so its path can look nothing like a broad global index.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the asset base is modest by ETF standards.
  • GOLS 0.90% a year is what the theme costs. The big communication services index funds, XLC and FCOM, charge 0.08%.
  • Launched in 2026, so there is no long record to lean on, and assets and trading volume are still building, which tends to mean wider spreads.
  • Built for capital appreciation, not income. Payouts are not part of the stated objective.

Full AGNG profile⁠

Full GOLS profile⁠

AGNG vs GOLS Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGNG vs GOLS Cost

Overpaying GOLS vs AGNG

$7,061

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGNG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • GOLS 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGNG 0.50%
  • GOLS 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GOLS $17,040AGNG $9,979

Year by year

YearAGNGGOLSOverpaying
10$900$1,593$693
20$3,460$6,015$2,555
30$9,979$17,040$7,061

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AGNG, cheaper
  • 0.90%GOLS
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds

GOLS 18th cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG vs GOLS Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.80%
GOLS No data
Payout (12M)
AGNG $0.33
GOLS None
Last payment
AGNG $0.16
GOLS No data
Ex-dividend
AGNG Jun 29, 2026
GOLS No data
Paid on
AGNG Jul 7, 2026
GOLS No data
Frequency
AGNG Twice a year
GOLS No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AGNGTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll AGNG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.20; Dec 28, 2018 $0.19; Jun 27, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.14; Jun 29, 2020 $0.04; Dec 30, 2020 $0.05; Jun 29, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.17; Jun 29, 2022 $0.11; Dec 29, 2022 $0.02; Jun 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 28, 2023 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.17; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
GOLSAll GOLS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AGNG vs GOLS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGNG 13.1%GOLS No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGNG 0.98GOLS No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGNG −23.2%GOLS No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGNG 0.59GOLS 0.53

AGNG and GOLS in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • AGNGAvsFITEA

    Global X Aging Population ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOLSDvsFITEA

    Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsICOPB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOLSDvsICOPB

    Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsWRNDB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • GOLSDvsWRNDB

    Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.