Skip to content
etf.net

AGNG vs FITE

Global X Aging Population ETF

AGNGANasdaq

State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

FITEANYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

FITE −0.05pt a year

AGNG0.50%FITE0.45%

Avg volume · 30D

AGNG 1.5×the volume

AGNG10.4KFITE7.11K

5Y return · a year

FITE +8.9pt

AGNG+6.8%FITE+15.7%

AGNG vs FITE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+38.7%AGNG+107.3%FITE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. AGNG +38.7%. FITE +107.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%75%125%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AGNG 0.50%
FITE 0.45%, better
Fund size
AGNG $96M
FITE $161M
1Y total return
AGNG +18.0%
FITE +24.6%, better
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.83%, better
FITE 0.11%
Holdings
AGNG 87
FITE 79
Avg volume (30D)
AGNG 10.4K sh, better
FITE 7.11K sh
NAV per share
AGNG $39.56
FITE $115.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AGNG: Cost 67, Risk 80, Mission not scored, Tradability 63, Holdings 76, Durability 74. FITE: Cost 83, Risk 71, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 82, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for AGNG, FITE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAGNGFITE
Cost30% weightB67A83Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA80HigherA71
Tradability15% weightB63A78Higher
Holdings10% weightA76A82Higher
Durability5% weightA74A82Higher

Rank among Global Thematic funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AGNG and FITE are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Thematic⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

FITE ranks 1st and AGNG 2nd of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.

  1. Rank 1AFITEState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 2AAGNGGlobal X Aging Population ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BWRNDNYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETFScore 69

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AGNGAGlobal X Aging Population ETF

FITEAState Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF

In short

AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.

FITE Most "security" funds mean cybersecurity. FITE reads the word wider: cyber plus border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and AR/VR, bundled into one global index basket since 2017.

Stated mandate

AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.

FITE The fund seeks to track the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, targeting companies whose products and services support future security through areas such as cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables, and virtual or augmented reality.

Why people hold it

  • AGNG One ticket on the demographics trade: roughly 80 developed-market companies tied to older consumers, tracking the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.50% a year, below the median fee in its global thematic peer group. Niche themes usually charge a premium for the privilege.
  • Running since 2016, so the theme has a long live record rather than a backtest and a pitch deck.
  • Portfolio construction and risk profile put it among the stronger builds in its global thematic peer group.
  • FITE One theme, many fronts: cybersecurity, border security, robotics, drones, space, wearables and virtual/augmented reality all sit inside the same index.ssga.com
  • A 0.45% fee undercuts the typical global thematic fund, and it comes from State Street's SPDR lineup rather than a one-fund boutique.
  • Live since 2017, so it has traded through a full cycle of thematic hype and hangover instead of arriving on a back-test.
  • Roughly 80 names spread across sectors and countries, so no single defense contractor or chipmaker steers the whole portfolio.ssga.com

Worth knowing

  • AGNG Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mega-cap funds and how you place the order matters more.
  • One theme, tilted to healthcare and developed markets, so its path can look nothing like a broad global index.
  • Distributions arrive annually or semiannually, not monthly, and the asset base is modest by ETF standards.
  • FITE Thinly traded next to broad index funds, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads at the moment you transact.
  • Small by SPDR standards. Niche thematic funds lean on sustained investor interest to hold their scale.
  • "Security" is drawn by index rules, so wearables and AR headset makers land beside the cyber and border names.

Full AGNG profile⁠

Full FITE profile⁠

AGNG vs FITE Holdings

As of

How AGNG and FITE differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AGNG and 0.0% of FITE.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector6 Sectors3.8%
  • Countryby domicile62.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in AGNG and FITE, widest gap first
SectorMore in AGNGMore in FITE
Health CareAGNG +87.3 points
TechnologyFITE +61.3 points
IndustrialsFITE +30.1 points
Real EstateAGNG +8.9 points
CommunicationFITE +3.0 points
EnergyFITE +1.8 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AGNG and FITE, widest gap first
CountryMore in AGNGMore in FITE
United StatesFITE +30.7 points
SwitzerlandAGNG +11.5 points
DenmarkAGNG +6.3 points
JapanAGNG +5.6 points
IsraelFITE +4.4 points
United KingdomAGNG +3.2 points
BelgiumAGNG +3.1 points
ChinaAGNG +3.1 points
Other countries (11)AGNG +2.4 points

Outside the US: AGNG 86% developed, 14% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AGNG33.9%
  • FITE23.3%

Securities held

  • AGNG84
  • FITE78

Asset class

AGNG
Equity
FITE
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AGNG84
  • In both0
  • Only in FITE78

Only in AGNG

84 securities, 100% of AGNG by weight

  • AbbVie Inc3.95%
  • Eli Lilly & Co3.69%
  • Merck & Co. Inc.3.54%

Only in FITE

78 securities, 99.9% of FITE by weight

  • RAPID7 Inc2.95%
  • Qualys Inc2.61%
  • Zscaler Inc2.47%

Weight gaps

AGNG and FITE share no securities.

All 83 AGNG holdings⁠All 78 FITE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AGNG vs FITE Cost

Overpaying AGNG vs FITE

$938

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AGNG 0.50%

    $9,979

  • FITE 0.45%

    $9,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AGNG 0.50%
  • FITE 0.45%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530AGNG $9,979FITE $9,041

Year by year

YearAGNGFITEOverpaying
10$900$812$88
20$3,460$3,128$332
30$9,979$9,041$938

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AGNG
  • 0.45%FITE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Global Thematic funds
  • Median 0.58%

FITE 3rd cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds

AGNG vs FITE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AGNG 0.83%, better
FITE 0.11%
Payout (12M)
AGNG $0.33
FITE $0.12
Last payment
AGNG $0.16
FITE $0.04
Ex-dividend
AGNG Jun 29, 2026
FITE Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
AGNG Jul 7, 2026
FITE Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
AGNG Twice a year
FITE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AGNGTwice a year · 17 paymentsAll AGNG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 17 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2017 $0.20; Dec 28, 2018 $0.19; Jun 27, 2019 $0.05; Dec 30, 2019 $0.14; Jun 29, 2020 $0.04; Dec 30, 2020 $0.05; Jun 29, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.17; Jun 29, 2022 $0.11; Dec 29, 2022 $0.02; Jun 29, 2023 $0.15; Dec 28, 2023 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.10; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2025 $0.14; Dec 30, 2025 $0.17; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
FITEQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll FITE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 19, 2018 $0.02; Jun 18, 2018 $0.02; Sep 24, 2018 $0.01; Dec 24, 2018 $0.47; Mar 18, 2019 $0.05; Jun 24, 2019 $0.01; Sep 23, 2019 $0.05; Dec 23, 2019 $0.06; Mar 23, 2020 $0.31; Jun 22, 2020 $0.02; Dec 21, 2020 $0.08; Mar 22, 2021 $0.28; Jun 21, 2021 $0.0094; Sep 20, 2021 $0.13; Dec 20, 2021 $0.07; Mar 21, 2022 $0.0097; Jun 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 19, 2022 $0.02; Mar 20, 2023 $0.0037; Jun 20, 2023 $0.02; Sep 18, 2023 $0.02; Dec 18, 2023 $0.03; Mar 18, 2024 $0.03; Jun 24, 2024 $0.02; Sep 23, 2024 $0.02; Dec 23, 2024 $0.0071; Mar 24, 2025 $0.05; Jun 23, 2025 $0.04; Sep 22, 2025 $0.06; Dec 22, 2025 $0.04; Mar 23, 2026 $0.03; Jun 22, 2026 $0.01; Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AGNG vs FITE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AGNG
  • FITE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: FITE −27.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AGNG 13.1%, betterFITE 21.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AGNG 0.98FITE 1.26, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AGNG −23.9%, betterFITE −27.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AGNG 0.60FITE 1.32

Popular comparisons

  • AGNGAvsWRNDB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITEAvsWRNDB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsICOPB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITEAvsICOPB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AGNGAvsHAILB

    Global X Aging Population ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FITEAvsHAILB

    State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.45% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.