AGNG ranks 2nd and WRND 3rd of 18 funds in the Global Thematic Category.
AGNG vs WRND
WRND −0.32pt a year
0.50%0.18%
AGNG 19.6×the volume
10.4K532
WRND +4.9pt
+17.7%+22.6%
AGNG vs WRND Performance
+18.0%+9.3%
- AGNG 0.50%
- WRND 0.18%, better
- AGNG $96M
- WRND $11M
- AGNG +18.0%, better
- WRND +9.3%
- AGNG 0.83%
- WRND 0.97%, better
- AGNG 87
- WRND 208
- AGNG 10.4K sh, better
- WRND 532 sh
- AGNG $39.56
- WRND $40.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGNG | WRND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B67 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A80Higher | A76 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B58 |
| Durability | A74Higher | C47 |
Rank among Global Thematic funds
Same Category. AGNG and WRND are both graded against the same 18 Global Thematic funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGNGA
WRNDB
In short
AGNG AGNG plays the one trend nobody needs a crystal ball for: people getting older. About 80 developed-market names in medical devices, pharma and senior living, wrapped around an aging-population index, for 0.50% a year.
WRND Most innovation funds sell you a story. WRND buys receipts: roughly 200 companies worldwide picked on what they actually spend on R&D and whether that spending earns a return, at a fee well under the thematic norm.
Stated mandate
AGNG The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index.
WRND The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index. Its passive strategy targets innovative companies worldwide based on high research and development spending.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGNG vs WRND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGNG vs WRND Cost
Overpaying AGNG vs WRND
$6,230
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGNG 0.50%
$9,979
WRND 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGNG | WRND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $328 | $572 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,281 | $2,179 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,749 | $6,230 |
- 0.50%AGNG
- 0.18%WRND, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Thematic funds
- Median 0.58%
WRND cheapest of 18 funds
AGNG 7th cheapest of 18 funds
AGNG vs WRND Dividends
- AGNG 0.83%
- WRND 0.97%, better
- AGNG $0.33
- WRND $0.40
- AGNG $0.16
- WRND $0.10
- AGNG Jun 29, 2026
- WRND Sep 30, 2026
- AGNG Jul 7, 2026
- WRND Oct 2, 2026
- AGNG Twice a year
- WRND Quarterly
Distribution history
AGNG vs WRND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGNG 13.1%, betterWRND 14.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGNG 0.98WRND 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- AGNG −23.9%WRND −27.2%
- Market sensitivity
- AGNG 0.60WRND 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.