Skip to content

AHLT vs ENDW

Ahl Liquid Trend ETF

AHLTCNYSE Arca

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.74pt a year

AHLT0.96%ENDW0.22%

Avg volume · 30D

AHLT 1.4×the volume

AHLT24.3KENDW17.1K

AHLT vs ENDW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+21.0%AHLT+14.9%ENDW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AHLT +21.0%. ENDW +14.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%25%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AHLT 0.96%
ENDW 0.22%, better
Fund size
AHLT $186M
ENDW $160M
1Y total return
AHLT +21.0%, better
ENDW +14.9%
Yield (12M)
AHLT 1.49%
ENDW 2.37%, better
Holdings
AHLT 32
ENDW 73
Avg volume (30D)
AHLT 24.3K sh, better
ENDW 17.1K sh
NAV per share
AHLT $30.36
ENDW $34.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AHLT: Cost 44, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 44, Durability 75. ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for AHLT, ENDW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAHLTENDW
Cost30% weightC44A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA81
Risk15% weightD37A75Higher
Tradability15% weightB58B69Higher
Holdings10% weightC44B62Higher
Durability5% weightA75HigherB65

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AHLT and ENDW are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and AHLT 29th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 28CTHYToews Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETFScore 48
  4. Rank 29CAHLTAhl Liquid Trend ETFScore 47
  5. Rank 29CDALIFirst Trust Dorsey Wright DALI Equity ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AHLTCAhl Liquid Trend ETF

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

In short

AHLT Man AHL's managed-futures playbook in an ETF: fully systematic trend signals, long or short, across more than 20 global markets. American Beacon's debut ETF, live since 2023, at 0.96% with no fee waiver.

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

Stated mandate

AHLT The Fund seeks capital growth through a quantitative, systematic trend-following strategy across more than 20 global markets. It uses derivatives and may take both long and short positions, with exposure adjusted through volatility scaling and risk controls.

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

Why people hold it

  • AHLT Signals, not opinions: the model takes long or short positions across stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities in more than 20 markets, with no discretionary buy or sell calls.americanbeaconfunds.com
  • Volatility scaling is built into the process: exposure is trimmed when a market turns turbulent and added back, within risk limits, as it calms.sec.gov
  • AHL Partners (Man Group's London quant arm) runs the trading, delivered in a 1940 Act ETF with daily exchange liquidity instead of a private-fund structure.sec.govbenzinga.com
  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.

Worth knowing

  • AHLT The 0.96% fee is near the category median and carries no waiver; leaner tactical options exist, such as ENDW at 0.22% and GMOD at 0.50% net of a waiver through June 30, 2027.
  • A smaller fund that trades thinly, so spreads can be wider than on heavily traded index ETFs.
  • Trend models follow prices rather than forecast them, and the portfolio uses derivatives and shorts, which can amplify moves in NAV.sec.gov
  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.

Full AHLT profile⁠

Full ENDW profile⁠

AHLT vs ENDW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AHLT vs ENDW Cost

Overpaying AHLT vs ENDW

$13,476

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AHLT 0.96%

    $18,034

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AHLT 0.96%
  • ENDW 0.22%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530AHLT $18,034ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearAHLTENDWOverpaying
10$1,695$401$1,294
20$6,383$1,561$4,822
30$18,034$4,558$13,476

Expense ratio

  • 0.96%AHLT
  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

AHLT 27th cheapest of 46 funds

AHLT vs ENDW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AHLT 1.49%
ENDW 2.37%, better
Payout (12M)
AHLT $0.45
ENDW $0.82
Last payment
AHLT $0.45
ENDW $0.16
Ex-dividend
AHLT Dec 22, 2025
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
AHLT Dec 24, 2025
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
AHLT Irregular
ENDW Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

AHLTIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AHLT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2023 $0.83; Dec 22, 2025 $0.45. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD
ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.5020232026YTD

AHLT vs ENDW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AHLT 14.8%ENDW 9.2%since May 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AHLT 0.15ENDW 1.99since May 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AHLT −20.1%since Aug 2023ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AHLT −0.10ENDW 0.61

AHLT and ENDW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AHLTCvsGMODA

    Ahl Liquid Trend ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.96% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsGMODA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AHLTCvsPTBDA

    Ahl Liquid Trend ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.96% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AHLTCvsRISNA

    Ahl Liquid Trend ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.96% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.