ENDW ranks 1st and AHLT 29th of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.
AHLT vs ENDW
ENDW −0.74pt a year
0.96%0.22%
AHLT 1.4×the volume
24.3K17.1K
AHLT vs ENDW Performance
+21.0%+14.9%
- AHLT 0.96%
- ENDW 0.22%, better
- AHLT $186M
- ENDW $160M
- AHLT +21.0%, better
- ENDW +14.9%
- AHLT 1.49%
- ENDW 2.37%, better
- AHLT 32
- ENDW 73
- AHLT 24.3K sh, better
- ENDW 17.1K sh
- AHLT $30.36
- ENDW $34.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AHLT | ENDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | D37 | A75Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | B62Higher |
| Durability | A75Higher | B65 |
Rank among Tactical Allocation funds
Same Category. AHLT and ENDW are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AHLTC
ENDWA
In short
AHLT Man AHL's managed-futures playbook in an ETF: fully systematic trend signals, long or short, across more than 20 global markets. American Beacon's debut ETF, live since 2023, at 0.96% with no fee waiver.
ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.
Stated mandate
AHLT The Fund seeks capital growth through a quantitative, systematic trend-following strategy across more than 20 global markets. It uses derivatives and may take both long and short positions, with exposure adjusted through volatility scaling and risk controls.
ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AHLT vs ENDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AHLT vs ENDW Cost
Overpaying AHLT vs ENDW
$13,476
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AHLT 0.96%
$18,034
ENDW 0.22%
$4,558
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AHLT | ENDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,695 | $401 | $1,294 |
| 20 | $6,383 | $1,561 | $4,822 |
| 30 | $18,034 | $4,558 | $13,476 |
- 0.96%AHLT
- 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
- Median 0.93%
ENDW cheapest of 46 funds
AHLT 27th cheapest of 46 funds
AHLT vs ENDW Dividends
- AHLT 1.49%
- ENDW 2.37%, better
- AHLT $0.45
- ENDW $0.82
- AHLT $0.45
- ENDW $0.16
- AHLT Dec 22, 2025
- ENDW Sep 28, 2026
- AHLT Dec 24, 2025
- ENDW Sep 30, 2026
- AHLT Irregular
- ENDW Quarterly
Distribution history
AHLT vs ENDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AHLT 14.8%ENDW 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AHLT 0.15ENDW 1.99
- Worst fall
- AHLT −20.1%ENDW −6.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AHLT −0.10ENDW 0.61
AHLT and ENDW in the news

Category Review
Tactical funds ranged from a 32.2% gain to a 12.5% loss

Popular comparisons
- 0.96% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.72%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.