Skip to content

ENDW vs GMOD

Cambria Endowment Style ETF

ENDWANasdaq

GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

GMODANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ENDW −0.28pt a year

ENDW0.22%GMOD0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

ENDW 1.4×the volume

ENDW17.1KGMOD11.8K

ENDW vs GMOD Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+14.9%ENDW+11.8%GMOD

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ENDW +14.9%. GMOD +11.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ENDW 0.22%, better
GMOD 0.50%
Fund size
ENDW $160M
GMOD $49M
1Y total return
ENDW +14.9%, better
GMOD +11.8%
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
GMOD No data
Holdings
ENDW 73
GMOD 20
Avg volume (30D)
ENDW 17.1K sh, better
GMOD 11.8K sh
NAV per share
ENDW $34.35
GMOD $27.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ENDW: Cost 100, Risk 75, Mission 81, Tradability 69, Holdings 62, Durability 65. GMOD: Cost 90, Risk 75, Mission 74, Tradability 73, Holdings 64, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for ENDW, GMOD, with each pillar’s weight
PillarENDWGMOD
Cost30% weightA100HigherA90
Mission25% weightA81HigherA74
Risk15% weightA75A75
Tradability15% weightB69A73Higher
Holdings10% weightB62B64Higher
Durability5% weightB65HigherC49

Rank among Tactical Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ENDW and GMOD are both graded against the same 46 Tactical Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Tactical Allocation⁠

Category · 46 funds
See all 46 ›

ENDW ranks 1st and GMOD 2nd of 46 funds in the Tactical Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AENDWCambria Endowment Style ETFScore 81
  2. Rank 2AGMODGMO Dynamic Allocation ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3APTBDPacer Trendpilot US Bond ETFScore 72

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ENDWACambria Endowment Style ETF

GMODAGMO Dynamic Allocation ETF

In short

ENDW The endowment playbook in one ticker: global stocks, bonds and real assets, actively steered by Cambria, with built-in leverage, for 0.22% a year. Endowment ambition without the endowment fee schedule.

GMOD GMO's 7-year asset class forecasts, finally wrapped in an ETF. It tilts toward what the firm's valuation models call cheap and away from what they call expensive, shifting between stocks, bonds and alternatives inside one ticker.

Stated mandate

ENDW ENDW seeks income and capital appreciation. It is actively managed to provide exposure to multiple major asset classes through underlying ETFs or individual equities.

GMOD The Fund seeks positive total return. It allocates among asset classes using GMO's multi-year return forecasts and relative-risk assessments.

Why people hold it

  • ENDW 0.22% a year against a roughly 0.95% median for tactical allocation funds, and cheaper than the other standouts in the group such as ONOF (0.39%) and GMOD (0.50%).
  • One ticker spans US, developed and emerging markets across equities, bonds and real assets, roughly 70 positions, with value and momentum screens applied on top.cambriafunds.com
  • Capital efficient by design: the manager expects notional exposure of 100% to 150% of assets, using Treasury futures alongside the underlying ETF sleeves.usnews.combusinesswire.com
  • Pays income quarterly, and on our review it sits among the strongest implementations in the tactical allocation group.
  • GMOD 0.50% all-in, about half the typical fee in its tactical-allocation peer group, and a contractual waiver offsets the fees of the GMO funds it holds so costs are not stacked.sec.gov
  • GMO's first multi-asset strategy in an ETF, run by the asset allocation team behind the firm's long-running 7-year asset class forecasts.gmo.com
  • The equity dial can swing between 40% and 80% of assets under normal conditions, so the fund handles the reallocating rather than you selling positions to do it.gmo.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of a crowded tactical multi-asset group on cost and process clarity.

Worth knowing

  • ENDW It owns other ETFs, which charge their own fees on top of the 0.22% management fee, so the all-in cost of ownership runs higher than the headline.cambriafunds.com
  • Leverage works both ways. Notional exposure above 100% of assets magnifies moves in either direction, and Cambria itself calls the risk profile aggressive.businesswire.com
  • Launched in 2025 and still modest in size, so the record is short and shares change hands less often than mainstream index funds.
  • GMOD New in 2025 and lightly traded so far, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the big allocation ETFs.
  • It owns other GMO funds, and the single 0.50% rate leans on a contractual waiver with an expiration date rather than a permanent cap.sec.gov
  • Cheaper tactical allocators exist (ENDW at 0.22%, ONOF at 0.39%), though each runs a different process.

Full ENDW profile⁠

Full GMOD profile⁠

ENDW vs GMOD Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ENDW vs GMOD Cost

Overpaying GMOD vs ENDW

$5,421

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ENDW 0.22%

    $4,558

  • GMOD 0.50%

    $9,979

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ENDW 0.22%
  • GMOD 0.50%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530GMOD $9,979ENDW $4,558

Year by year

YearENDWGMODOverpaying
10$401$900$499
20$1,561$3,460$1,899
30$4,558$9,979$5,421

Expense ratio

  • 0.22%ENDW, cheaper
  • 0.50%GMOD
  • Middle half of Tactical Allocation funds
  • Median 0.93%

ENDW cheapest of 46 funds

GMOD 6th cheapest of 46 funds

ENDW vs GMOD Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ENDW 2.37%
GMOD No data
Payout (12M)
ENDW $0.82
GMOD No data
Last payment
ENDW $0.16
GMOD $0.14
Ex-dividend
ENDW Sep 28, 2026
GMOD Jun 30, 2026
Paid on
ENDW Sep 30, 2026
GMOD Jul 1, 2026
Frequency
ENDW Quarterly
GMOD Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ENDWQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll ENDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2025 $0.06; Sep 29, 2025 $0.18; Dec 30, 2025 $0.35; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.15; Sep 28, 2026 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
GMODTwice a year · 2 paymentsAll GMOD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Jun 30, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ENDW vs GMOD Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ENDW 9.2%since May 2025GMOD 8.7%since Nov 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ENDW 1.99since May 2025GMOD 0.89since Nov 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ENDW −6.4%since Apr 2025GMOD −6.5%since Oct 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ENDW 0.61GMOD 0.48

Popular comparisons

  • ENDWAvsPTBDA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPTBDA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsRISNA

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsRISNA

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.72%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ENDWAvsPBLB

    Cambria Endowment Style ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.22% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMODAvsPBLB

    GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF · PGIM Portfolio Ballast ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.