FLAX ranks 3rd and AIA 7th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AIA vs FLAX
FLAX −0.31pt a year
0.50%0.19%
AIA 41.1×the volume
404K9.82K
AIA +5.1pt
+12.2%+7.1%
AIA vs FLAX Performance
+78.2%+41.2%
- AIA 0.50%
- FLAX 0.19%, better
- AIA $4.55B
- FLAX $67M
- AIA +30.5%, better
- FLAX +13.9%
- AIA 1.69%
- FLAX 2.20%, better
- AIA 60
- FLAX 1648
- AIA 404K sh, better
- FLAX 9.82K sh
- AIA $126.91
- FLAX $33.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIA | FLAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | B57Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D31 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | F15 |
| Holdings | D28 | B59Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | D32 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AIA and FLAX are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIAC
FLAXB
In short
AIA A 50-stock shortlist of Asia's largest companies, running since 2007. Where broad international funds spread across thousands of names, this one concentrates on the region's blue-chip giants in a single ticker.
FLAX One line item for Asia's markets with Japan left out: roughly 1,600 stocks at 0.19% a year, less than half the median fee among index-tracking peers. Broad, cheap, and thin to trade.
Stated mandate
AIA The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of 50 of the largest Asian equities.
FLAX The Fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIA vs FLAX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIA vs FLAX Cost
Overpaying AIA vs FLAX
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIA 0.50%
$9,979
FLAX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIA | FLAX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $347 | $553 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,351 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,952 | $6,027 |
- 0.50%AIA
- 0.19%FLAX, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
FLAX 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
AIA 6th cheapest of 7 funds
AIA vs FLAX Dividends
- AIA 1.69%
- FLAX 2.20%, better
- AIA $2.14
- FLAX $0.74
- AIA $0.51
- FLAX $0.20
- AIA Jun 15, 2026
- FLAX Jun 26, 2026
- AIA Jun 18, 2026
- FLAX Jul 6, 2026
- AIA Twice a year
- FLAX Twice a year
Distribution history
AIA vs FLAX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AIA
- FLAX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIA 21.5%FLAX 16.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AIA 1.36, betterFLAX 1.03
- Worst fall
- AIA −43.9%FLAX −34.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AIA 1.14FLAX 1.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.