BBAX ranks 4th and AIA 7th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AIA vs BBAX
BBAX −0.31pt a year
0.50%0.19%
AIA 1.8×the volume
404K218K
AIA +5.5pt
+12.2%+6.7%
AIA vs BBAX Performance
+78.2%+38.1%
- AIA 0.50%
- BBAX 0.19%, better
- AIA $4.55B
- BBAX $6.76B
- AIA +30.5%, better
- BBAX +15.8%
- AIA 1.69%
- BBAX 3.77%, better
- AIA 60
- BBAX 100
- AIA 404K sh, better
- BBAX 218K sh
- AIA $126.91
- BBAX $62.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIA | BBAX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | B57Higher |
| Mission | A81Higher | B66 |
| Risk | D31 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | D28 | D30Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | B57 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AIA and BBAX are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIAC
BBAXB
In short
AIA A 50-stock shortlist of Asia's largest companies, running since 2007. Where broad international funds spread across thousands of names, this one concentrates on the region's blue-chip giants in a single ticker.
BBAX Developed Asia Pacific with Japan deliberately cut out: Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand in one ticket. The region's other half, indexed, at a price below the typical international blend fund.
Stated mandate
AIA The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of 50 of the largest Asian equities.
BBAX The fund is designed to provide indexed exposure to developed Asian Pacific equity markets while excluding Japan.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIA vs BBAX Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIA vs BBAX Cost
Overpaying AIA vs BBAX
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIA 0.50%
$9,979
BBAX 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIA | BBAX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $347 | $553 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,351 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $3,952 | $6,027 |
- 0.50%AIA
- 0.19%BBAX, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
BBAX 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
AIA 6th cheapest of 7 funds
AIA vs BBAX Dividends
- AIA 1.69%
- BBAX 3.77%, better
- AIA $2.14
- BBAX $2.36
- AIA $0.51
- BBAX $0.79
- AIA Jun 15, 2026
- BBAX Sep 22, 2026
- AIA Jun 18, 2026
- BBAX Sep 24, 2026
- AIA Twice a year
- BBAX Quarterly
Distribution history
AIA vs BBAX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AIA
- BBAX
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIA 21.5%BBAX 13.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AIA 1.36, betterBBAX 0.94
- Worst fall
- AIA −43.9%BBAX −23.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AIA 1.14BBAX 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.