IPAC ranks 2nd and AIA 7th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
AIA vs IPAC
IPAC −0.41pt a year
0.50%0.09%
AIA 4.1×the volume
404K98.1K
AIA +4.0pt
+12.5%+8.5%
AIA vs IPAC Performance
+78.2%+46.5%
- AIA 0.50%
- IPAC 0.09%, better
- AIA $4.55B
- IPAC $2.67B
- AIA +30.5%, better
- IPAC +15.3%
- AIA 1.69%
- IPAC 3.87%, better
- AIA 60
- IPAC 1344
- AIA 404K sh, better
- IPAC 98.1K sh
- AIA $126.91
- IPAC $82.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIA | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A77Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A81 |
| Risk | D31 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | D28 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | C51 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. AIA and IPAC are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIAC
IPACA
In short
AIA A 50-stock shortlist of Asia's largest companies, running since 2007. Where broad international funds spread across thousands of names, this one concentrates on the region's blue-chip giants in a single ticker.
IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.
Stated mandate
AIA The fund seeks to track the investment results of an index made up of 50 of the largest Asian equities.
IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIA vs IPAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIA vs IPAC Cost
Overpaying AIA vs IPAC
$8,081
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIA 0.50%
$9,979
IPAC 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIA | IPAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $165 | $735 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $646 | $2,814 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $1,898 | $8,081 |
- 0.50%AIA
- 0.09%IPAC, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
AIA 6th cheapest of 7 funds
AIA vs IPAC Dividends
- AIA 1.69%
- IPAC 3.87%, better
- AIA $2.14
- IPAC $3.20
- AIA $0.51
- IPAC $0.88
- AIA Jun 15, 2026
- IPAC Jun 15, 2026
- AIA Jun 18, 2026
- IPAC Jun 18, 2026
- AIA Twice a year
- IPAC Twice a year
Distribution history
AIA vs IPAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AIA
- IPAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIA 21.5%IPAC 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AIA 1.36, betterIPAC 1.18
- Worst fall
- AIA −43.9%IPAC −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AIA 1.14IPAC 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.