QTUM ranks 1st and AIBD 28th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
AIBD vs QTUM
QTUM −0.65pt a year
1.05%0.40%
QTUM 49.0×the volume
7.38K362K
AIBD vs QTUM Performance
−17.3%+17.5%
- AIBD 1.05%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- AIBD $6M
- QTUM $5.06B
- AIBD −17.3%
- QTUM +17.5%, better
- AIBD 3.66%, better
- QTUM 1.05%
- AIBD 3
- QTUM 89
- AIBD 7.38K sh
- QTUM 362K sh, better
- AIBD $46.34
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIBD | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | F9 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A91 | |
| Durability | C45 | A79Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. AIBD and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIBDF
QTUMA
In short
AIBD Everyone else on the AI shelf is long. AIBD takes the other side, aiming for 200% of the inverse of a US AI and big data index for a single trading day. A trading tool with a one-day shelf life, not a set-and-forget short.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
AIBD The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the inverse of the Solactive US AI & Big Data Index’s daily performance. It is designed for a single trading day rather than for achieving that multiple over longer periods.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIBD vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIBD vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying AIBD vs QTUM
$11,405
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIBD 1.05%
$19,495
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIBD | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,847 | $723 | $1,124 |
| 20 | $6,927 | $2,793 | $4,134 |
| 30 | $19,495 | $8,090 | $11,405 |
- 1.05%AIBD
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
AIBD 30th cheapest of 30 funds
AIBD vs QTUM Dividends
- AIBD 3.66%, better
- QTUM 1.05%
- AIBD $1.88
- QTUM $1.40
- AIBD $0.50
- QTUM $0.46
- AIBD Sep 22, 2026
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- AIBD Sep 29, 2026
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- AIBD Quarterly
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
AIBD vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIBD 48.5%QTUM 28.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AIBD −1.08QTUM 1.30
- Worst fall
- AIBD −83.6%QTUM −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AIBD −3.32QTUM 1.67
AIBD and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.05% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.05% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


