QTUM ranks 1st and AIHY 4th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
AIHY vs QTUM
6.3%by weight
AIHY −0.03pt a year
0.37%0.40%
QTUM 15.3×the volume
23.6K362K
AIHY vs QTUM Performance
−1.5%−5.0%
- AIHY 0.37%, better
- QTUM 0.40%
- AIHY $17M
- QTUM $5.06B
- AIHY
- QTUM +17.5%
- AIHY
- QTUM 1.05%
- AIHY 13
- QTUM 89
- AIHY 23.6K sh
- QTUM 362K sh, better
- AIHY $20.01
- QTUM $134.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIHY | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | A86 |
| Mission | A74 | |
| Risk | A73Higher | A70 |
| Tradability | B56 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D25 | A91Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A79Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. AIHY and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIHYB
QTUMA
In short
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIHY vs QTUM Holdings
How AIHY and QTUM differ
6.3%
Shared holdings make up 60.4% of AIHY and 6.3% of QTUM.
Level by level
- Holdings6.3%
- Country65.4%
Sector
No Sector split for AIHY.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AIHYMore in QTUM | AIHY | QTUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | AIHY +28.8 points | 92.3% | 63.5% |
| Japan | QTUM +9.0 points | 0.0% | 9.0% |
| Taiwan | QTUM +7.4 points | 0.0% | 7.4% |
| China | AIHY +5.8 points | 7.7% | 1.9% |
| Netherlands | QTUM +4.8 points | 0.0% | 4.8% |
| Singapore | QTUM +2.8 points | 0.0% | 2.8% |
| United Kingdom | QTUM +1.7 points | 0.0% | 1.7% |
| Italy | QTUM +1.6 points | 0.0% | 1.6% |
| Other countries (7) | QTUM +7.2 points | 0.0% | 7.2% |
Outside the US: QTUM 68% developed, 32% emerging.
Concentration
- AIHY118.7%
- QTUM18.3%
- AIHY10
- QTUM86
Asset class
- AIHY
- Equity
- QTUM
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AIHY4
- In both6
- Only in QTUM80
Only in AIHY
4 securities, 28.1% of AIHY by weight
- Meta Platforms Inc19.42%
- Space Exploration Technologies Corp3.45%
- Apple Inc3.21%
- Tencent Holdings Ltd2.03%
Only in QTUM
80 securities, 93.6% of QTUM by weight
- Global Unichip Corp2.44%
- Elastic NV2.09%
- Palantir Technologies Inc1.85%
- Horizon Quantum Holdings LTD1.83%
- Nutanix Inc1.77%
- Cloudflare Inc1.67%
- Snowflake Inc1.67%
- Reply SpA1.67%
- RadNet Inc1.65%
- NEC Corp1.61%
- Lockheed Martin Corp1.58%
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co1.58%
- Arqit Quantum Inc1.57%
- NTT Inc1.55%
- RTX Corp1.47%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.46%
- Asustek Computer Inc1.45%
- Fujitsu Ltd1.43%
- Hitachi Ltd1.42%
- Texas Instruments Inc1.39%
- Airbus Group SE1.39%
- Analog Devices Inc1.39%
- Teradata Corp1.35%
- Wipro Ltd1.34%
- Northrop Grumman Corp1.34%
- NVIDIA Corp1.33%
- Synopsys Inc1.33%
- MongoDB Inc1.32%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1.30%
- Micron Technology Inc1.30%
- International Business Machines Corp1.24%
- Koninklijke KPN NV1.23%
- MediaTek Inc1.21%
- NXP Semiconductors NV1.19%
- Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd1.19%
- ASML Holding NV1.18%
- Microchip Technology Inc1.15%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.15%
- Broadcom Inc1.14%
- QUALCOMM Inc1.13%
- ABB Ltd1.12%
- Cadence Design Systems Inc1.11%
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp1.11%
- Alchip Technologies Ltd1.09%
- Teradyne Inc1.03%
- Applied Materials Inc1.03%
- Tokyo Electron Ltd1.02%
- Astera Labs Inc1.02%
- ASM International NV1.02%
- Marvell Technology Inc1.02%
Weight gaps
All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AIHYMore in QTUM | AIHY | QTUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | AIHY +25.86 points | 26.19% | 0.33% |
| Microsoft Corp | AIHY +19.88 points | 21.60% | 1.72% |
| Alphabet Inc | AIHY +2.53 points | 3.56% | 1.03% |
| Amazon.com Inc | AIHY +2.38 points | 3.70% | 1.32% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | AIHY +1.71 points | 2.82% | 1.11% |
| Oracle Corp | AIHY +1.71 points | 2.56% | 0.85% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIHY vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying QTUM vs AIHY
$577
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIHY 0.37%
$7,513
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIHY | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $670 | $723 | $53 |
| 20 | $2,590 | $2,793 | $203 |
| 30 | $7,513 | $8,090 | $577 |
- 0.37%AIHY, cheaper
- 0.40%QTUM
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
AIHY 4th cheapest of 30 funds
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
AIHY vs QTUM Dividends
- AIHY
- QTUM 1.05%
- AIHY None
- QTUM $1.40
- AIHY
- QTUM $0.46
- AIHY
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- AIHY
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- AIHY
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
AIHY vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIHY QTUM 28.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AIHY QTUM 1.30
- Worst fall
- AIHY QTUM −38.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AIHY 0.00QTUM 1.67
AIHY and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.37% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.37% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



