Skip to content

AIHY vs QTUM

Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

AIHYBNYSE Arca

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUMANasdaq

Overlap

6.3%by weight

Expense ratio

AIHY −0.03pt a year

AIHY0.37%QTUM0.40%

Avg volume · 30D

QTUM 15.3×the volume

AIHY23.6KQTUM362K

AIHY vs QTUM Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−1.5%AIHY−5.0%QTUM

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. AIHY −1.5%. QTUM −5.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AIHY 0.37%, better
QTUM 0.40%
Fund size
AIHY $17M
QTUM $5.06B
1Y total return
AIHY No data
QTUM +17.5%
Yield (12M)
AIHY No data
QTUM 1.05%
Holdings
AIHY 13
QTUM 89
Avg volume (30D)
AIHY 23.6K sh
QTUM 362K sh, better
NAV per share
AIHY $20.01
QTUM $134.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AIHY: Cost 90, Risk 73, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 25, Durability 41. QTUM: Cost 86, Risk 70, Mission 74, Tradability 70, Holdings 91, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for AIHY, QTUM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAIHYQTUM
Cost30% weightA90HigherA86
Mission25% weightNot scoredA74
Risk15% weightA73HigherA70
Tradability15% weightB56A70Higher
Holdings10% weightD25A91Higher
Durability5% weightC41A79Higher

Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AIHY and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Artificial Intelligence⁠

Category · 30 funds
See all 30 ›

QTUM ranks 1st and AIHY 4th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.

  1. Rank 1AQTUMDefiance Quantum ETFScore 79
  2. Rank 1AXAIXXtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETFScore 79
  3. Rank 3AARTYiShares Future AI & Tech ETFScore 72
  4. Rank 4BAIHYDefiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETFScore 67
  5. Rank 5BBAIiShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETFScore 65

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AIHYBDefiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF

QTUMADefiance Quantum ETF

In short

AIHY No data

QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.

Stated mandate

AIHY No data

QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.

Why people hold it

AIHY No data

  • QTUM 0.40% a year against a 0.68% median for its AI-theme cohort, and it undercuts peers like WTAI (0.45%) and ALAI (0.55%).
  • Rules-based by design: it tracks the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index, so no manager is hand-picking which quantum story wins.
  • About 90 holdings across global markets, so the theme rides on a basket instead of two or three pure plays.
  • Size and liquidity back it up: a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the stronger implementations in its thematic peer group.

Worth knowing

AIHY No data

  • QTUM Risk is the softest part of the profile. One narrow, early-stage theme in a single asset class means sharper swings than a broad-market fund.
  • The index covers machine learning as well as quantum, so part of the basket is familiar AI exposure rather than quantum specialists.
  • Distributions come quarterly, but a growth theme like this is not built around income.

Full AIHY profile⁠

Full QTUM profile⁠

AIHY vs QTUM Holdings

How AIHY and QTUM differ

Overlap by weight

6.3%

Shared holdings make up 60.4% of AIHY and 6.3% of QTUM.

Level by level

  • Holdings6 in both6.3%
  • Countryby domicile65.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for AIHY.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AIHY and QTUM, widest gap first
CountryMore in AIHYMore in QTUM
United StatesAIHY +28.8 points
JapanQTUM +9.0 points
TaiwanQTUM +7.4 points
ChinaAIHY +5.8 points
NetherlandsQTUM +4.8 points
SingaporeQTUM +2.8 points
United KingdomQTUM +1.7 points
ItalyQTUM +1.6 points
Other countries (7)QTUM +7.2 points

Outside the US: QTUM 68% developed, 32% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AIHY118.7%
  • QTUM18.3%

Securities held

  • AIHY10
  • QTUM86

Asset class

AIHY
Equity
QTUM
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AIHY4
  • In both6
  • Only in QTUM80

Only in AIHY

4 securities, 28.1% of AIHY by weight

  • Meta Platforms Inc19.42%
  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp3.45%
  • Apple Inc3.21%

Only in QTUM

80 securities, 93.6% of QTUM by weight

  • Global Unichip Corp2.44%
  • Elastic NV2.09%
  • Palantir Technologies Inc1.85%

Weight gaps

All 6 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AIHY and QTUM, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AIHYMore in QTUM
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031AIHY +25.86 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTAIHY +19.88 points
Alphabet IncGOOGLAIHY +2.53 points
Amazon.com IncAMZNAIHY +2.38 points
Alibaba Group Holding LtdBABAAIHY +1.71 points
Oracle CorpORCLAIHY +1.71 points

All 14 AIHY holdings⁠All 89 QTUM holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AIHY vs QTUM Cost

Overpaying QTUM vs AIHY

$577

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AIHY 0.37%

    $7,513

  • QTUM 0.40%

    $8,090

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AIHY 0.37%
  • QTUM 0.40%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530QTUM $8,090AIHY $7,513

Year by year

YearAIHYQTUMOverpaying
10$670$723$53
20$2,590$2,793$203
30$7,513$8,090$577

Expense ratio

  • 0.37%AIHY, cheaper
  • 0.40%QTUM
  • Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
  • Median 0.65%

AIHY 4th cheapest of 30 funds

QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds

AIHY vs QTUM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AIHY No data
QTUM 1.05%
Payout (12M)
AIHY None
QTUM $1.40
Last payment
AIHY No data
QTUM $0.46
Ex-dividend
AIHY No data
QTUM Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
AIHY No data
QTUM Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
AIHY No data
QTUM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

AIHYAll AIHY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTUMQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll QTUM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.04; Mar 12, 2019 $0.02; Jun 24, 2019 $0.08; Sep 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 26, 2019 $0.04; Mar 24, 2020 $0.03; Jun 23, 2020 $0.07; Sep 22, 2020 $0.06; Dec 29, 2020 $0.05; Mar 24, 2021 $0.03; Jun 23, 2021 $0.10; Sep 22, 2021 $0.08; Dec 29, 2021 $0.07; Mar 23, 2022 $0.08; Jun 22, 2022 $0.19; Sep 21, 2022 $0.23; Dec 28, 2022 $0.07; Mar 22, 2023 $0.08; Jun 21, 2023 $0.12; Sep 20, 2023 $0.15; Dec 27, 2023 $0.09; Mar 20, 2024 $0.10; Jun 26, 2024 $0.20; Sep 25, 2024 $0.12; Dec 27, 2024 $0.08; Mar 26, 2025 $0.16; Jun 25, 2025 $0.27; Sep 24, 2025 $0.24; Dec 29, 2025 $0.45; Mar 25, 2026 $0.22; Jun 24, 2026 $0.27; Sep 23, 2026 $0.46. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.50202020232026YTD

AIHY vs QTUM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AIHY No dataQTUM 28.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AIHY No dataQTUM 1.30
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AIHY No dataQTUM −38.4%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AIHY 0.00QTUM 1.67

AIHY and QTUM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AIHYBvsXAIXA

    Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsXAIXA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AIHYBvsARTYA

    Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsARTYA

    Defiance Quantum ETF · iShares Future AI & Tech ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AIHYBvsBAIB

    Defiance AI Hyperscale Leaders ETF · iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTUMAvsBAIB

    Defiance Quantum ETF · iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.40% · 0.55%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.