QTUM ranks 2nd and AIVC 7th of 30 funds in the Artificial Intelligence Category.
AIVC vs QTUM
QTUM −0.19pt a year
0.59%0.40%
QTUM 26.5×the volume
13.6K359K
QTUM +7.5pt
+10.7%+18.2%
AIVC vs QTUM Performance
+66.4%+130.4%
- AIVC 0.59%
- QTUM 0.40%, better
- AIVC $108M
- QTUM $4.59B
- AIVC +29.2%, better
- QTUM +12.9%
- AIVC 0.13%
- QTUM 1.14%, better
- AIVC 48
- QTUM 89
- AIVC 13.6K sh
- QTUM 359K sh, better
- AIVC $89.82
- QTUM $123.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIVC | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A86Higher |
| Mission | A73 | |
| Risk | C53 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A83 | A92Higher |
| Durability | A75 | A79Higher |
Rank among Artificial Intelligence funds
Same Category. AIVC and QTUM are both graded against the same 30 Artificial Intelligence funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIVCB
QTUMA
In short
AIVC An AI basket without the mega-cap gravity. AIVC holds roughly 50 semiconductor, cloud and hardware names worldwide at equal weight, so the small supplier gets the same slot as the biggest chipmaker.
QTUM Live since 2018, QTUM turns the quantum-computing story into a plain index fund: about 90 global names spanning quantum hardware and machine learning, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
AIVC AIVC seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Equal Weight Total Return Index. It uses an equal-weighted global mix of semiconductor, cloud/software, and hardware companies supporting AI technologies.
QTUM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the BlueStar® Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index. It uses a passive indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIVC vs QTUM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIVC vs QTUM Cost
Overpaying AIVC vs QTUM
$3,545
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIVC 0.59%
$11,635
QTUM 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIVC | QTUM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,058 | $723 | $335 |
| 20 | $4,051 | $2,793 | $1,258 |
| 30 | $11,635 | $8,090 | $3,545 |
- 0.59%AIVC
- 0.40%QTUM, cheaper
- Middle half of Artificial Intelligence funds
- Median 0.65%
QTUM 5th cheapest of 30 funds
AIVC 11th cheapest of 30 funds
AIVC vs QTUM Dividends
- AIVC 0.13%
- QTUM 1.14%, better
- AIVC $0.12
- QTUM $1.40
- AIVC $0.12
- QTUM $0.46
- AIVC Dec 30, 2025
- QTUM Sep 23, 2026
- AIVC Dec 31, 2025
- QTUM Sep 24, 2026
- AIVC Annual
- QTUM Quarterly
Distribution history
AIVC vs QTUM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AIVC
- QTUM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIVC 31.5%QTUM 28.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AIVC 1.20QTUM 1.30, better
- Worst fall
- AIVC −53.0%QTUM −38.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AIVC 1.73QTUM 1.67
AIVC and QTUM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.59% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


