ALDB vs BUFP: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

ALDBBCboe

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

BUFPBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ALDB −0.20pt a year

ALDB0.30%BUFP0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFP 10.5×the volume

ALDB6.84KBUFP72.1K

ALDB vs BUFP Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.7%ALDB+1.7%BUFP

Expense ratio: ALDB 0.30%, better; BUFP 0.50%
Fund size: ALDB $12M; BUFP $338M
1Y total return: ALDB No data; BUFP +10.7%
Yield (12M): ALDB No data; BUFP 0.01%
Holdings: ALDB 5; BUFP 15
Avg volume (30D): ALDB 6.84K sh; BUFP 72.1K sh, better
NAV per share: ALDB $25.73; BUFP $33.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for ALDB, BUFP, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	ALDB	BUFP
Cost30% weight	A100Higher	A85
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B56	B61Higher
Tradability15% weight	C41	C48Higher
Holdings10% weight	D39	A71Higher
Durability5% weight	F11	C53Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. ALDB and BUFP are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Laddered Buffer⁠

Category · 18 funds

See all 18 ›

BUFP ranks 1st and ALDB 3rd of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.

Rank 1BBUFPPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFScore 69
Rank 2BPBFRPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFScore 68
Rank 3BALDBAptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETFScore 65
Rank 4BIVVMiShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETFScore 64

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ALDBBAptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

BUFPBPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF

In short

ALDB No data

BUFP Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFP skips the choice: it owns twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFs, one per calendar month, so part of the ladder resets on a rolling basis.

Stated mandate

ALDB No data

BUFP The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained via a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek limited downside protection and capped upside over a specified period, while the Fund itself has no stated buffer.

Why people hold it

ALDB No data

BUFP Twelve underlying buffer ETFs, one for each month, spread the entry point instead of locking everything to a single outcome period and a single cap.pgim.com
Each underlying ETF targets a buffer against the first 12% (before fees) of SPY's price-return losses over a one-year period, paired with an upside cap.pgim.com
A 0.50% fee sits well under the 0.79% typical of buffer peers, and the package ranks among the stronger implementations in that group.

Worth knowing

ALDB No data

BUFP The wrapper itself has no stated buffer. PGIM notes it likely won't get the full benefit of the underlying buffers, and their caps limit its upside.pgim.com
Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than at the category's giants. Matters most on larger orders.
Live since 2024, so the record is short. PSFF, the other fund-of-buffer-ETFs in the group, carries a lower fee.

Full ALDB profile⁠

Full BUFP profile⁠

ALDB vs BUFP Holdings

How ALDB and BUFP differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ALDB and 0.0% of BUFP.

Level by level

Asset classEquity, Alternatives0.0%
Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile99.5%
Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in ALDB and BUFP, widest gap first
Sector	More in ALDBMore in BUFP	ALDB	BUFP
Technology	Same weight	40.1%	40.1%
Financials	Same weight	11.3%	11.3%
Communication	Same weight	9.9%	9.9%
Health Care	Same weight	9.4%	9.4%
Consumer Discretionary	Same weight	8.7%	8.7%
Industrials	Same weight	7.6%	7.6%
Consumer Staples	Same weight	4.4%	4.4%
Energy	Same weight	3.4%	3.4%
Utilities	Same weight	1.9%	1.9%
Real Estate	Same weight	1.7%	1.7%
Materials	Same weight	1.6%	1.6%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ALDB and BUFP, widest gap first
Country	More in ALDBMore in BUFP	ALDB	BUFP
United States	BUFP +0.5 points	99.5%	100.0%
Switzerland	ALDB +0.3 points	0.3%	0.0%
China	ALDB +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Mexico	ALDB +0.1 points	0.1%	0.0%
Ireland	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%
United Kingdom	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

ALDB100.0%
BUFP83.3%

Securities held

ALDB5
BUFP13

Asset class

ALDB: Equity
BUFP: Alternatives

Holdings

Only in ALDB5
In both0
Only in BUFP13

Only in ALDB

5 securities, 100% of ALDB by weight

Aptus October Deep Buffer ETF25.20%
Aptus January Deep Buffer ETF24.95%
Aptus April Deep Buffer ETF24.89%
Aptus July Deep Buffer ETF24.88%
Cash & Other0.08%

Only in BUFP

13 securities, 100% of BUFP by weight

Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - February8.39%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - July8.34%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - November8.33%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - April8.33%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - March8.33%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - December8.33%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - August8.33%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - January8.32%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - May8.32%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - September8.32%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - October8.32%
Pgim S&P 500 Buffer 12 Etf - June8.32%
Net Current Assets0.00%

Weight gaps

ALDB and BUFP share no securities.

All ALDB holdings⁠All BUFP holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ALDB vs BUFP Cost

Overpaying BUFP vs ALDB

$3,830

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

ALDB 0.30%
$6,149
BUFP 0.50%
$9,979

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

ALDB 0.30%
BUFP 0.50%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	ALDB	BUFP	Overpaying
10	$545	$900	$355
20	$2,113	$3,460	$1,347
30	$6,149	$9,979	$3,830

Expense ratio

0.30%ALDB, cheaper
0.50%BUFP

ALDB0.30%BUFP0.50%

0.30%1.21%

Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Median 0.89%

ALDB cheapest of 18 funds

BUFP 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

ALDB vs BUFP Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): ALDB No data; BUFP 0.01%
Payout (12M): ALDB None; BUFP $0.0024
Last payment: ALDB No data; BUFP $0.0024
Ex-dividend: ALDB No data; BUFP Dec 30, 2025
Paid on: ALDB No data; BUFP Jan 2, 2026
Frequency: ALDB No data; BUFP Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

ALDBAll ALDB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFPIrregular · 2 paymentsAll BUFP payments⁠

ALDB vs BUFP Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: ALDB No dataBUFP 6.0%since Jul 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: ALDB No dataBUFP 1.21since Jul 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: ALDB No dataBUFP −12.0%since Jun 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: ALDB 0.46BUFP 0.50; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

ALDBBvsPBFRB
Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.50%
Category
BUFPBvsPBFRB
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category
ALDBBvsIVVMB
Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.50%
Category
BUFPBvsIVVMB
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · iShares Large Cap Moderate Quarterly Laddered ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category
ALDBBvsBUFFB
Aptus Laddered Deep Buffer ETF · Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.30% · 0.89%
Category
BUFPBvsBUFFB
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF · Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.89%
Category