BUFP ranks 1st and PBFR 2nd of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFP vs PBFR
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
BUFP 1.5×the volume
72.1K48.7K
BUFP vs PBFR Performance
+10.7%+8.4%
- BUFP 0.50%
- PBFR 0.50%
- BUFP $338M
- PBFR $244M
- BUFP +10.7%, better
- PBFR +8.4%
- BUFP 0.01%
- PBFR 0.01%
- BUFP 15
- PBFR 14
- BUFP 72.1K sh, better
- PBFR 48.7K sh
- BUFP $33.11
- PBFR $31.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFP | PBFR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A85 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | C48Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | A71 | A71 |
| Durability | C53 | C53 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFP and PBFR are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFPB
PBFRB
In short
BUFP Most buffer funds make you pick a start month and live with it. BUFP skips the choice: it owns twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFs, one per calendar month, so part of the ladder resets on a rolling basis.
PBFR Most buffer ETFs make you pick a start month. PBFR skips that: one ticker holding twelve monthly vintages of PGIM's 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, so caps and buffers are staggered across the calendar.
Stated mandate
BUFP The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained via a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek limited downside protection and capped upside over a specified period, while the Fund itself has no stated buffer.
PBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained through a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFs, each intended to limit downside risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFP vs PBFR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFP vs PBFR Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFP 0.50%
$9,979
PBFR 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFP | PBFR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%BUFP
- 0.50%PBFR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
BUFP 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
PBFR 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFP vs PBFR Dividends
- BUFP 0.01%
- PBFR 0.01%
- BUFP $0.0024
- PBFR $0.0025
- BUFP $0.0024
- PBFR $0.0025
- BUFP Dec 30, 2025
- PBFR Dec 30, 2025
- BUFP Jan 2, 2026
- PBFR Jan 2, 2026
- BUFP Irregular
- PBFR Irregular
Distribution history
BUFP vs PBFR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFP 6.0%PBFR 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFP 1.21PBFR 1.22
- Worst fall
- BUFP −12.0%PBFR −8.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFP 0.50PBFR 0.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.