AMA ranks 102nd and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMA vs GOGL
0.0%by weight
GOGL −1.11pt a year
1.31%0.20%
AMA 15.4×the volume
291K18.9K
AMA vs GOGL Performance
−51.7%−42.4%
- AMA 1.31%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- AMA $18M
- GOGL $4M
- AMA 7
- GOGL 1
- AMA 291K sh, better
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- AMA $14.08
- GOGL $15.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMA | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A82 | |
| Risk | B58 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61Higher | D36 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMA and GOGL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMAC
GOGLC
In short
AMA The first ETF to bolt 2x daily leverage onto Applied Materials, the company whose machines help make the chips. One stock, double the daily move, reset every night, at a 1.31% expense ratio.
Stated mandate
AMA The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Applied Materials, Inc.'s share price, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMA vs GOGL Holdings
How AMA and GOGL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMA and 0.0% of GOGL.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMA and GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- AMA295.3%
- GOGL199.3%
- AMA2
- GOGL0
Asset class
- AMA
- Leveraged/Inverse
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AMA2
- In both0
- Only in GOGL0
Only in AMA
2 securities, 95.2% of AMA by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202688.58%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20316.65%
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Weight gaps
AMA and GOGL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMA vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying AMA vs GOGL
$19,364
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMA 1.31%
$23,519
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMA | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $365 | $1,915 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $1,421 | $7,029 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $4,155 | $19,364 |
- 1.31%AMA
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
AMA 236th cheapest of 315 funds
AMA vs GOGL Dividends
- AMA None
- GOGL None
Distribution history
AMA vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- AMA 7.18GOGL −3.37
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.