PANG ranks 3rd and AMA 102nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMA vs PANG
PANG −0.55pt a year
1.31%0.76%
AMA 6.5×the volume
291K44.6K
AMA vs PANG Performance
−51.7%−1.5%
- AMA 1.31%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- AMA $18M
- PANG $9M
- AMA
- PANG +76.3%
- AMA 7
- PANG 4
- AMA 291K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- AMA $14.08
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMA | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B58 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMA and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMAC
PANGA
In short
AMA The first ETF to bolt 2x daily leverage onto Applied Materials, the company whose machines help make the chips. One stock, double the daily move, reset every night, at a 1.31% expense ratio.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AMA The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Applied Materials, Inc.'s share price, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMA vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMA vs PANG Cost
Overpaying AMA vs PANG
$8,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMA 1.31%
$23,519
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMA | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,353 | $927 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $5,142 | $3,308 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $14,656 | $8,863 |
- 1.31%AMA
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AMA 236th cheapest of 315 funds
AMA vs PANG Dividends
- AMA None
- PANG
- AMA
- PANG $1.30
- AMA
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- AMA
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- AMA
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
AMA vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMA PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMA PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AMA PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AMA 7.18PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.