OKTG ranks 3rd and AMA 102nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMA vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
OKTG −0.56pt a year
1.31%0.75%
AMA 7.6×the volume
291K38.5K
AMA vs OKTG Performance
−51.7%+39.8%
- AMA 1.31%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- AMA $18M
- OKTG $8M
- AMA 7
- OKTG 6
- AMA 291K sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- AMA $14.08
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMA | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A82 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B58 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMA and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMAC
OKTGA
In short
AMA The first ETF to bolt 2x daily leverage onto Applied Materials, the company whose machines help make the chips. One stock, double the daily move, reset every night, at a 1.31% expense ratio.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
AMA The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Applied Materials, Inc.'s share price, before fees and expenses.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMA vs OKTG Holdings
How AMA and OKTG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMA and 0.0% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMA and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMAMore in OKTG | AMA | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMA295.3%
- OKTG207.4%
- AMA2
- OKTG1
Asset class
- AMA
- Leveraged/Inverse
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AMA2
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in AMA
2 securities, 95.2% of AMA by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202688.58%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20316.65%
Only in OKTG
1 security, 7.4% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20407.35%
Weight gaps
AMA and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMA vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying AMA vs OKTG
$9,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMA 1.31%
$23,519
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMA | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,336 | $944 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $5,078 | $3,372 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $14,482 | $9,037 |
- 1.31%AMA
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
AMA 236th cheapest of 315 funds
AMA vs OKTG Dividends
- AMA None
- OKTG None
Distribution history
AMA vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- AMA 7.18OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.