TSMG ranks 1st and AMA 102nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMA vs TSMG
TSMG −0.55pt a year
1.31%0.76%
AMA 4.2×the volume
291K69K
AMA vs TSMG Performance
−51.7%−7.6%
- AMA 1.31%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- AMA $18M
- TSMG $28M
- AMA
- TSMG +36.4%
- AMA 7
- TSMG 5
- AMA 291K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- AMA $14.08
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMA | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D25 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A82Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B58 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B61 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMA and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMAC
TSMGA
In short
AMA The first ETF to bolt 2x daily leverage onto Applied Materials, the company whose machines help make the chips. One stock, double the daily move, reset every night, at a 1.31% expense ratio.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
AMA The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in Applied Materials, Inc.'s share price, before fees and expenses.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMA vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMA vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying AMA vs TSMG
$8,863
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMA 1.31%
$23,519
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMA | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,280 | $1,353 | $927 |
| 20 | $8,450 | $5,142 | $3,308 |
| 30 | $23,519 | $14,656 | $8,863 |
- 1.31%AMA
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AMA 236th cheapest of 315 funds
AMA vs TSMG Dividends
- AMA None
- TSMG
- AMA
- TSMG $2.73
- AMA
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- AMA
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- AMA
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
AMA vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMA TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMA TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- AMA TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AMA 7.18TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.31% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.31% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.