Skip to content

AMLP vs XES

Alerian MLP ETF

AMLPCNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

XESBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XES −0.66pt a year

AMLP1.01%XES0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

AMLP 15.3×the volume

AMLP1.16MXES76K

10Y return · a year

AMLP +10.4pt

AMLP+7.4%XES−3.0%

AMLP vs XES Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+130.0%AMLP+111.0%XES

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. AMLP +130.0%. XES +111.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%25%50%75%150%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AMLP 1.01%
XES 0.35%, better
Fund size
AMLP $13B
XES $366M
1Y total return
AMLP +25.4%
XES +43.4%, better
Yield (12M)
AMLP 7.53%, better
XES 1.05%
Holdings
AMLP 21
XES 36
Avg volume (30D)
AMLP 1.16M sh, better
XES 76K sh
NAV per share
AMLP $53.98
XES $113.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AMLP: Cost 8, Risk 77, Mission 44, Tradability 69, Holdings 34, Durability 73. XES: Cost 87, Risk 18, Mission 40, Tradability 72, Holdings 83, Durability 76.
Pillar letters and Scores for AMLP, XES, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAMLPXES
Cost30% weightF8A87Higher
Mission25% weightC44HigherC40
Risk15% weightA77HigherF18
Tradability15% weightB69A72Higher
Holdings10% weightD34A83Higher
Durability5% weightA73A76Higher

Rank among Energy Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AMLP and XES are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Energy Sector⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

XES ranks 1st and AMLP 6th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1BXESState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETFScore 61
  2. Rank 2BMLPXGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 5CMDSTWestwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETFScore 43
  4. Rank 6CAMLPAlerian MLP ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 7FCOALRange Global Coal Index ETFScore 24

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AMLPCAlerian MLP ETF

XESBState Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF

In short

AMLP The original MLP ETF: launched in 2010, a portfolio built on midstream energy partnerships rather than a watered-down version, with the fund absorbing the K-1 paperwork and the fund-level taxes that come with it.

XES Oilfield services without the two giants calling the shots. XES tracks a modified equal-weight index of about 30 drillers and equipment makers, so mid- and small-caps carry real weight, and it has been doing that since 2006 at 0.35%.

Stated mandate

AMLP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, which provides exposure to energy-infrastructure MLPs primarily engaged in midstream activities.

XES The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index.

Why people hold it

  • AMLP The original. Launched in 2010 as the first ETF to open up master limited partnerships, and it still tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index it debuted with.prnewswire.comalpsfunds.com
  • No K-1 pile in your mailbox. The fund receives and processes the partnership K-1s itself and sends shareholders a single Form 1099.alpsfunds.com
  • Undiluted exposure. Most MLP funds cap partnerships near 25% to keep pass-through tax status (MLPX takes that route); AMLP's index stays with midstream MLPs.sec.govalpsfunds.com
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively and distributes quarterly, so getting in and out is usually the easy part.
  • XES Modified equal weighting, reset each quarter, spreads the fund across roughly 30 drillers and equipment names rather than letting the sector's largest two dominate.ssga.comspglobal.com
  • 0.35% a year, well under the median for its energy peer group and under PXJ's 0.67% in the same oil services niche.
  • A clean services play: holdings come only from the oil and gas drilling and equipment and services sub-industries, not producers, refiners or pipelines.ssga.com
  • Trading since 2006, through multiple drilling booms and busts, with distributions paid quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • AMLP Pricey for the aisle: a 1.01% expense ratio sits above the energy-sector median, and cheaper midstream wrappers exist (MLPX at 0.45%).
  • Taxed as a C-corp, not a pass-through. It accrues deferred taxes on appreciation and return-of-capital distributions inside NAV, and revises those estimates as MLP tax data arrives.alpsfunds.comsec.gov
  • Narrow by design: a capped, float-adjusted basket of energy-infrastructure partnerships earning most cash flow from midstream work, so it moves with one corner of energy.alpsfunds.com
  • XES About 30 stocks in one narrow, capex-driven industry, so moves tend to be sharper than a broad energy fund's.
  • Equal weighting puts small and mid caps on the same footing as the majors, which cuts both ways on volatility.ssga.com
  • A mid-sized fund with moderate trading rather than a category heavyweight, so execution costs matter more on larger orders.

Full AMLP profile⁠

Full XES profile⁠

AMLP vs XES Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AMLP vs XES Cost

Overpaying AMLP vs XES

$11,724

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AMLP 1.01%

    $18,850

  • XES 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AMLP 1.01%
  • XES 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530AMLP $18,850XES $7,126

Year by year

YearAMLPXESOverpaying
10$1,780$634$1,146
20$6,686$2,454$4,232
30$18,850$7,126$11,724

Expense ratio

  • 1.01%AMLP
  • 0.35%XES, cheaper
  • Middle half of Energy Sector funds
  • Median 0.63%

XES cheapest of 7 funds

AMLP 7th cheapest of 7 funds

AMLP vs XES Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AMLP 7.53%, better
XES 1.05%
Payout (12M)
AMLP $4.07
XES $1.20
Last payment
AMLP $1.03
XES $0.26
Ex-dividend
AMLP Aug 12, 2026
XES Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
AMLP Aug 17, 2026
XES Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
AMLP Quarterly
XES Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AMLPQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll AMLP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Feb 8, 2017 $1.13; May 10, 2017 $1.08; Aug 9, 2017 $1.08; Nov 9, 2017 $1.03; Feb 8, 2018 $1.04; May 10, 2018 $1.04; Aug 9, 2018 $1.04; Nov 8, 2018 $0.96; Feb 14, 2019 $0.98; May 9, 2019 $0.98; Aug 8, 2019 $0.95; Nov 14, 2019 $0.98; Feb 13, 2020 $0.95; May 7, 2020 $0.75; Aug 13, 2020 $0.75; Nov 12, 2020 $0.71; Feb 11, 2021 $0.68; May 13, 2021 $0.68; Aug 12, 2021 $0.68; Nov 10, 2021 $0.76; Feb 10, 2022 $0.71; May 12, 2022 $0.73; Aug 11, 2022 $0.74; Nov 9, 2022 $0.75; Feb 9, 2023 $0.77; May 11, 2023 $0.86; Aug 10, 2023 $0.83; Nov 9, 2023 $0.88; Feb 8, 2024 $0.88; May 9, 2024 $0.94; Aug 8, 2024 $0.94; Nov 13, 2024 $0.95; Feb 12, 2025 $0.97; May 14, 2025 $0.98; Aug 13, 2025 $0.98; Nov 12, 2025 $1.00; Feb 11, 2026 $1.01; May 13, 2026 $1.03; Aug 12, 2026 $1.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD
XESQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XES payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.23; Jun 16, 2017 $0.22; Sep 15, 2017 $1.93; Dec 15, 2017 $0.49; Mar 16, 2018 $0.26; Jun 15, 2018 $0.29; Sep 21, 2018 $0.24; Dec 24, 2018 $0.25; Mar 18, 2019 $0.19; Jun 24, 2019 $0.26; Sep 23, 2019 $0.23; Dec 23, 2019 $0.48; Mar 23, 2020 $0.27; Jun 22, 2020 $0.18; Sep 21, 2020 $0.08; Dec 21, 2020 $0.07; Mar 22, 2021 $0.71; Jun 21, 2021 $0.07; Sep 20, 2021 $0.07; Dec 20, 2021 $0.05; Mar 21, 2022 $0.07; Jun 21, 2022 $0.06; Sep 19, 2022 $0.07; Dec 19, 2022 $0.09; Mar 20, 2023 $0.06; Jun 20, 2023 $0.14; Sep 18, 2023 $0.16; Dec 18, 2023 $0.19; Mar 18, 2024 $0.19; Jun 24, 2024 $0.26; Sep 23, 2024 $0.31; Dec 23, 2024 $0.28; Mar 24, 2025 $0.32; Jun 23, 2025 $0.39; Sep 22, 2025 $0.36; Dec 22, 2025 $0.31; Mar 23, 2026 $0.33; Jun 22, 2026 $0.31; Sep 21, 2026 $0.26. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22017202020232026YTD

AMLP vs XES Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AMLP
  • XES
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XES −46.0% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AMLP 14.7%, betterXES 29.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AMLP 0.89, betterXES 0.35
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AMLP −20.9%, betterXES −46.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AMLP 0.26XES 0.75

AMLP and XES in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AMLPCvsMLPXB

    Alerian MLP ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XESBvsMLPXB

    State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF · Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMLPCvsTMLPC

    Alerian MLP ETF · Tortoise MLP ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XESBvsTMLPC

    State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF · Tortoise MLP ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMLPCvsPXJC

    Alerian MLP ETF · Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XESBvsPXJC

    State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF · Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.