XES ranks 1st and AMLP 6th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.
AMLP vs XES
XES −0.66pt a year
1.01%0.35%
AMLP 15.3×the volume
1.16M76K
AMLP +10.4pt
+7.4%−3.0%
AMLP vs XES Performance
+130.0%+111.0%
- AMLP 1.01%
- XES 0.35%, better
- AMLP $13B
- XES $366M
- AMLP +25.4%
- XES +43.4%, better
- AMLP 7.53%, better
- XES 1.05%
- AMLP 21
- XES 36
- AMLP 1.16M sh, better
- XES 76K sh
- AMLP $53.98
- XES $113.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMLP | XES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F8 | A87Higher |
| Mission | C44Higher | C40 |
| Risk | A77Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | B69 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A76Higher |
Rank among Energy Sector funds
Same Category. AMLP and XES are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMLPC
XESB
In short
AMLP The original MLP ETF: launched in 2010, a portfolio built on midstream energy partnerships rather than a watered-down version, with the fund absorbing the K-1 paperwork and the fund-level taxes that come with it.
XES Oilfield services without the two giants calling the shots. XES tracks a modified equal-weight index of about 30 drillers and equipment makers, so mid- and small-caps carry real weight, and it has been doing that since 2006 at 0.35%.
Stated mandate
AMLP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, which provides exposure to energy-infrastructure MLPs primarily engaged in midstream activities.
XES The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMLP vs XES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMLP vs XES Cost
Overpaying AMLP vs XES
$11,724
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMLP 1.01%
$18,850
XES 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMLP | XES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $634 | $1,146 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $2,454 | $4,232 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $7,126 | $11,724 |
- 1.01%AMLP
- 0.35%XES, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Sector funds
- Median 0.63%
XES cheapest of 7 funds
AMLP 7th cheapest of 7 funds
AMLP vs XES Dividends
- AMLP 7.53%, better
- XES 1.05%
- AMLP $4.07
- XES $1.20
- AMLP $1.03
- XES $0.26
- AMLP Aug 12, 2026
- XES Sep 21, 2026
- AMLP Aug 17, 2026
- XES Sep 23, 2026
- AMLP Quarterly
- XES Quarterly
Distribution history
AMLP vs XES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AMLP
- XES
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMLP 14.7%, betterXES 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMLP 0.89, betterXES 0.35
- Worst fall
- AMLP −20.9%, betterXES −46.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AMLP 0.26XES 0.75
AMLP and XES in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




