XES ranks 1st and PXJ 4th of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.
PXJ vs XES
XES −0.28pt a year
0.63%0.35%
XES 1.3×the volume
58.6K76K
PXJ +4.1pt
+1.1%−3.0%
PXJ vs XES Performance
+186.8%+111.0%
- PXJ 0.63%
- XES 0.35%, better
- PXJ $139M
- XES $366M
- PXJ +62.4%, better
- XES +43.4%
- PXJ 2.63%, better
- XES 1.05%
- PXJ 33
- XES 36
- PXJ 58.6K sh
- XES 76K sh, better
- PXJ $46.96
- XES $113.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PXJ | XES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | C40 | |
| Risk | C46Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | B58 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A76Higher |
Rank among Energy Sector funds
Same Category. PXJ and XES are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PXJC
XESB
In short
PXJ Oilfield services run through a quant filter: PXJ's index ranks drillers, equipment makers and service firms on momentum, quality and value, then holds about 30. Trading since 2005, at 0.63% net of a waiver through August 31, 2028.
XES Oilfield services without the two giants calling the shots. XES tracks a modified equal-weight index of about 30 drillers and equipment makers, so mid- and small-caps carry real weight, and it has been doing that since 2006 at 0.35%.
Stated mandate
PXJ The Fund tracks the Dynamic Oil Services Intellidex Index by normally investing at least 90% of total assets in its constituent common stocks. The index targets 30 U.S. companies supporting oil and gas production, processing, and distribution.
XES The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PXJ vs XES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PXJ vs XES Cost
Overpaying PXJ vs XES
$5,233
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PXJ 0.63%
$12,359
XES 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PXJ | XES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $634 | $494 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $2,454 | $1,857 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $7,126 | $5,233 |
- 0.63%PXJ
- 0.35%XES, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Sector funds
- Median 0.63%
XES cheapest of 7 funds
PXJ 4th cheapest of 7 funds
PXJ vs XES Dividends
- PXJ 2.63%, better
- XES 1.05%
- PXJ $1.23
- XES $1.20
- PXJ $0.44
- XES $0.26
- PXJ Sep 21, 2026
- XES Sep 21, 2026
- PXJ Sep 25, 2026
- XES Sep 23, 2026
- PXJ Quarterly
- XES Quarterly
Distribution history
PXJ vs XES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PXJ
- XES
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PXJ 27.5%, betterXES 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PXJ 0.64, betterXES 0.35
- Worst fall
- PXJ −40.1%, betterXES −46.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PXJ 0.65XES 0.75
PXJ and XES in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


