XES ranks 1st and MLPX 2nd of 7 funds in the Energy Sector Category.
MLPX vs XES
XES −0.10pt a year
0.45%0.35%
MLPX 4.9×the volume
375K76K
MLPX +15.1pt
+12.1%−3.0%
MLPX vs XES Performance
+158.3%+111.0%
- MLPX 0.45%
- XES 0.35%, better
- MLPX $3.8B
- XES $366M
- MLPX +36.7%
- XES +43.4%, better
- MLPX 4.01%, better
- XES 1.05%
- MLPX 30
- XES 36
- MLPX 375K sh, better
- XES 76K sh
- MLPX $76.71
- XES $113.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MLPX | XES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A87Higher |
| Mission | D32 | C40Higher |
| Risk | B65Higher | F18 |
| Tradability | B66 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | C44 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A71 | A76Higher |
Rank among Energy Sector funds
Same Category. MLPX and XES are both graded against the same 7 Energy Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MLPXB
XESB
In short
MLPX A focused bet on the toll roads of American energy: roughly 30 pipeline and infrastructure names tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, running since 2013 at 0.45% a year.
XES Oilfield services without the two giants calling the shots. XES tracks a modified equal-weight index of about 30 drillers and equipment makers, so mid- and small-caps carry real weight, and it has been doing that since 2006 at 0.35%.
Stated mandate
MLPX The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the price and yield performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index.
XES The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MLPX vs XES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MLPX vs XES Cost
Overpaying MLPX vs XES
$1,915
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MLPX 0.45%
$9,041
XES 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MLPX | XES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $634 | $178 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $2,454 | $674 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $7,126 | $1,915 |
- 0.45%MLPX
- 0.35%XES, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy Sector funds
- Median 0.63%
XES cheapest of 7 funds
MLPX 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
MLPX vs XES Dividends
- MLPX 4.01%, better
- XES 1.05%
- MLPX $3.07
- XES $1.20
- MLPX $0.76
- XES $0.26
- MLPX Aug 10, 2026
- XES Sep 21, 2026
- MLPX Aug 13, 2026
- XES Sep 23, 2026
- MLPX Quarterly
- XES Quarterly
Distribution history
MLPX vs XES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MLPX
- XES
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MLPX 16.4%, betterXES 29.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- MLPX 1.32, betterXES 0.35
- Worst fall
- MLPX −19.7%, betterXES −46.0%
- Market sensitivity
- MLPX 0.28XES 0.75
MLPX and XES in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


