PANG ranks 3rd and AMUU 62nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMUU vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.30pt a year
1.06%0.76%
AMUU 1.6×the volume
73.2K44.6K
AMUU vs PANG Performance
+117.9%+91.6%
- AMUU 1.06%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- AMUU $87M
- PANG $9M
- AMUU +117.9%, better
- PANG +91.6%
- AMUU 4.47%
- PANG
- AMUU 11
- PANG 4
- AMUU 73.2K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- AMUU $231.55
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMUU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A94 |
| Risk | A73 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B59 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMUU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMUUB
PANGA
In short
AMUU Direxion's two-times bet on AMD: one ticker that aims to deliver 200% of the chipmaker's daily move, built mostly from swaps, with a 1x inverse sibling sitting on the other side of the same shelf.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AMUU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Advanced Micro Devices common shares. It is a leveraged single-stock strategy rather than an index fund.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMUU vs PANG Holdings
How AMUU and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMUU and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMUUMore in PANG | AMUU | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMUU100.0%
- PANG208.4%
- AMUU3
- PANG1
Asset class
- AMUU
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AMUU3
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in AMUU
3 securities, 18.3% of AMUU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5068.33%
- Advanced Micro Devices6.63%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut3.34%
Only in PANG
1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%
Weight gaps
AMUU and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMUU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying AMUU vs PANG
$4,999
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMUU 1.06%
$19,655
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMUU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,864 | $1,353 | $511 |
| 20 | $6,987 | $5,142 | $1,845 |
| 30 | $19,655 | $14,656 | $4,999 |
- 1.06%AMUU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AMUU 211th cheapest of 315 funds
AMUU vs PANG Dividends
- AMUU 4.47%
- PANG
- AMUU $8.09
- PANG
- AMUU $0.17
- PANG $1.30
- AMUU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- AMUU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- AMUU Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
AMUU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMUU 208.3%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMUU 1.34PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AMUU −56.5%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AMUU 5.22PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.06% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.06% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.