AMZD ranks 4th and SKDD 38th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs SKDD
0.0%by weight
AMZD −1.18pt a year
1.02%2.20%
AMZD 1.6×the volume
12.3M7.45M
AMZD vs SKDD Performance
+1.7%−33.1%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- SKDD 2.20%
- AMZD $16M
- SKDD $4M
- AMZD −13.5%
- SKDD
- AMZD 2.96%
- SKDD
- AMZD 3
- SKDD 1
- AMZD 12.3M sh, better
- SKDD 7.45M sh
- AMZD $8.34
- SKDD $11.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | SKDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F2 |
| Mission | A98 | |
| Risk | B68Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | A73 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71Higher | C41 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and SKDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
SKDDD
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs SKDD Holdings
How AMZD and SKDD differ
0.0%
About this figure: AMZD gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
SKDD gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZD.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMZD.
Concentration
- AMZD8265.4%
- SKDD200.1%
- AMZD1
- SKDD1
Asset class
- AMZD
- Leveraged/Inverse
- SKDD
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in AMZD1
- In both0
- Only in SKDD1
Only in AMZD
1 security, 100% of AMZD by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5062633.95%
Only in SKDD
1 security, 100% of SKDD by weight
- Skhy200.07%
Weight gaps
AMZD and SKDD share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs SKDD Cost
Overpaying SKDD vs AMZD
$16,294
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
SKDD 2.20%
$35,306
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | SKDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $3,690 | $1,893 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $13,157 | $6,411 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $35,306 | $16,294 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 2.20%SKDD
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
SKDD 42nd cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs SKDD Dividends
- AMZD 2.96%
- SKDD
- AMZD $0.24
- SKDD None
- AMZD $0.05
- SKDD
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- SKDD
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- SKDD
- AMZD Quarterly
- SKDD
Distribution history
AMZD vs SKDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%SKDD
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86SKDD
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%SKDD
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.36SKDD −3.50
AMZD and SKDD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.20% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.20% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.20% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


