Skip to content

AMZG vs COTG

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF

AMZGCCboe

Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

COTGANasdaq

Overlap

12.4%by weight

Expense ratio

AMZG −0.02pt a year

AMZG0.75%COTG0.77%

Avg volume · 30D

COTG 1.2×the volume

AMZG84KCOTG97.2K

AMZG vs COTG Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−11.2%AMZG+22.2%COTG

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. AMZG −11.2%. COTG +22.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%0%10%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AMZG 0.75%, better
COTG 0.77%
Fund size
AMZG $4M
COTG $9M
1Y total return
AMZG No data
COTG +16.3%
Holdings
AMZG 4
COTG 4
Avg volume (30D)
AMZG 84K sh
COTG 97.2K sh, better
NAV per share
AMZG $15.23
COTG $15.32
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AMZG: Cost 70, Risk 90, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 39. COTG: Cost 61, Risk 86, Mission 95, Tradability 77, Holdings not scored, Durability 56.
Pillar letters and Scores for AMZG, COTG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAMZGCOTG
Cost30% weightA70HigherB61
Mission25% weightNot scoredA95
Risk15% weightA90HigherA86
Tradability15% weightA76A77Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD39B56Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AMZG and COTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 312 funds
See all 312 ›

COTG ranks 3rd and AMZG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ACOTGLeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 124CAMKXCorgi AMKR 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 124CAMZGLeverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 124CAPHGLeverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AMZGCLeverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF

COTGALeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

In short

AMZG No data

COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.

Stated mandate

AMZG No data

COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

AMZG No data

  • COTG A plain mandate, plainly stated: 200% of Costco's daily move, before fees and expenses. No index to second-guess, no stock-picking layered on top.leverageshares.com
  • Costs less than the typical fund in the 2x single-stock crowd, and there's no temporary waiver holding that number down.
  • It has tracked its 2x daily target closely since its 2025 launch, putting it among the stronger implementations in a crowded peer group.

Worth knowing

AMZG No data

  • COTG Daily reset. Hold past one session and compounding takes over, so multi-week results can drift well away from 2x Costco. The issuer frames it as a tactical, often single-day tool.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, doubled. A single earnings print lands twice as hard on the day, with no second holding to cushion it.
  • Not one of the category's most heavily traded names, so the spread and the order type are worth a look.

Full AMZG profile⁠

Full COTG profile⁠

AMZG vs COTG Holdings

How AMZG and COTG differ

Overlap by weight

12.4%

Shared holdings make up 14.1% of AMZG and 12.4% of COTG.

About this figure: AMZG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both12.4%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for AMZG and COTG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AMZG and COTG, widest gap first
CountryMore in AMZGMore in COTGGap
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AMZG214.0%
  • COTG212.3%

Securities held

  • AMZG1
  • COTG1

Asset class

AMZG
Stocks
COTG
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in AMZG0
  • In both1
  • Only in COTG0

Only in AMZG

0 securities, 0.0% of AMZG by weight

Only in COTG

0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AMZG and COTG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AMZGMore in COTGGap
First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040AMZG +1.71 points

All 4 AMZG holdings⁠All 4 COTG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AMZG vs COTG Cost

Overpaying COTG vs AMZG

$347

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AMZG 0.75%

    $14,482

  • COTG 0.77%

    $14,829

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AMZG 0.75%
  • COTG 0.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530COTG $14,829AMZG $14,482

Year by year

YearAMZGCOTGOverpaying
10$1,336$1,371$35
20$5,078$5,205$127
30$14,482$14,829$347

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%AMZG, cheaper
  • 0.77%COTG
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

AMZG 87th cheapest of 312 funds

COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds

AMZG vs COTG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
AMZG None
COTG None

Distribution history

AMZGAll AMZG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

COTGAll COTG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AMZG vs COTG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AMZG No dataCOTG 38.3%since Oct 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AMZG No dataCOTG 0.12since Oct 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AMZG No dataCOTG −36.4%since Sep 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AMZG −0.15COTG −0.04

AMZG and COTG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AMZGCvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMZGCvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMZGCvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • COTGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.