COTG ranks 3rd and AMZG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMZG vs COTG
12.4%by weight
AMZG −0.02pt a year
0.75%0.77%
COTG 1.2×the volume
84K97.2K
AMZG vs COTG Performance
−11.2%+22.2%
- AMZG 0.75%, better
- COTG 0.77%
- AMZG $4M
- COTG $9M
- AMZG
- COTG +16.3%
- AMZG 4
- COTG 4
- AMZG 84K sh
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- AMZG $15.23
- COTG $15.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZG | COTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | A86 |
| Tradability | A76 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39 | B56Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMZG and COTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZGC
COTGA
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZG vs COTG Holdings
How AMZG and COTG differ
12.4%
Shared holdings make up 14.1% of AMZG and 12.4% of COTG.
About this figure: AMZG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings12.4%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZG and COTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMZGMore in COTG | Gap | AMZG | COTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMZG214.0%
- COTG212.3%
- AMZG1
- COTG1
Asset class
- AMZG
- Stocks
- COTG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AMZG0
- In both1
- Only in COTG0
Only in AMZG
0 securities, 0.0% of AMZG by weight
Only in COTG
0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AMZGMore in COTG | Gap | AMZG | COTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | AMZG +1.71 points | 14.07% | 12.36% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZG vs COTG Cost
Overpaying COTG vs AMZG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZG 0.75%
$14,482
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZG | COTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,371 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,205 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,829 | $347 |
- 0.75%AMZG, cheaper
- 0.77%COTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
AMZG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
AMZG vs COTG Dividends
- AMZG None
- COTG None
Distribution history
AMZG vs COTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZG COTG 38.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZG COTG 0.12
- Worst fall
- AMZG COTG −36.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZG −0.15COTG −0.04
AMZG and COTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
