TSMG ranks 2nd and AMZG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMZG vs TSMG
11.0%by weight
AMZG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
AMZG 1.2×the volume
84K68.1K
AMZG vs TSMG Performance
−11.2%−20.0%
- AMZG 0.75%, better
- TSMG 0.76%
- AMZG $4M
- TSMG $24M
- AMZG
- TSMG +40.3%
- AMZG 4
- TSMG 6
- AMZG 84K sh, better
- TSMG 68.1K sh
- AMZG $15.23
- TSMG $28.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | A90Higher | A82 |
| Tradability | A76 | A76 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMZG and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZGC
TSMGA
In short
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZG vs TSMG Holdings
How AMZG and TSMG differ
11.0%
Shared holdings make up 14.1% of AMZG and 11.0% of TSMG.
About this figure: AMZG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
TSMG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings11.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMZG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AMZGMore in TSMG | Gap | AMZG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- AMZG214.0%
- TSMG211.0%
- AMZG1
- TSMG2
Asset class
- AMZG
- Stocks
- TSMG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AMZG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG1
Only in AMZG
0 securities, 0.0% of AMZG by weight
Only in TSMG
1 security, 10.1% of TSMG by weight
- 874039100 Swp10.06%
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in AMZGMore in TSMG | Gap | AMZG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | AMZG +3.09 points | 14.07% | 10.98% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZG vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying TSMG vs AMZG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZG 0.75%
$14,482
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZG | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%AMZG, cheaper
- 0.76%TSMG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
AMZG 87th cheapest of 312 funds
TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds
AMZG vs TSMG Dividends
- AMZG None
- TSMG
- AMZG
- TSMG $2.73
- AMZG
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- AMZG
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- AMZG
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
AMZG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZG TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZG TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- AMZG TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZG −0.15TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.