Skip to content

AMZG vs TSMG

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF

AMZGCCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

TSMGANasdaq

Overlap

11.0%by weight

Expense ratio

AMZG −0.01pt a year

AMZG0.75%TSMG0.76%

Avg volume · 30D

AMZG 1.2×the volume

AMZG84KTSMG68.1K

AMZG vs TSMG Performance

Aug 7, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

−11.2%AMZG−20.0%TSMG

Aug 7, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. AMZG −11.2%. TSMG −20.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%0%10%20%30%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AMZG 0.75%, better
TSMG 0.76%
Fund size
AMZG $4M
TSMG $24M
1Y total return
AMZG No data
TSMG +40.3%
Holdings
AMZG 4
TSMG 6
Avg volume (30D)
AMZG 84K sh, better
TSMG 68.1K sh
NAV per share
AMZG $15.23
TSMG $28.23
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AMZG: Cost 70, Risk 90, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 39. TSMG: Cost 70, Risk 82, Mission 75, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for AMZG, TSMG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAMZGTSMG
Cost30% weightA70A70
Mission25% weightNot scoredA75
Risk15% weightA90HigherA82
Tradability15% weightA76A76
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD39B66Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AMZG and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 312 funds
See all 312 ›

TSMG ranks 2nd and AMZG 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  3. Rank 3ACOTGLeverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 124CAMKXCorgi AMKR 2x Daily ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 124CAMZGLeverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 124CAPHGLeverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AMZGCLeverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF

TSMGALeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

In short

AMZG No data

TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.

Stated mandate

AMZG No data

TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

AMZG No data

  • TSMG Charges 0.75% a year, undercutting the 0.96% on Direxion's 2x single-stock funds such as AAPU and GGLL.leverageshares.com
  • The milder gear on the leveraged shelf: it targets double TSM's daily move, not triple.leverageshares.com
  • Leverage arrives inside a regular 1940 Act ETF. No margin agreement, no lender, and your exposure is capped at what you put in.leverageshares.com
  • Hits its stated daily target tightly, and rates among the stronger builds in a crowded field of 2x and 3x single-stock funds.

Worth knowing

AMZG No data

  • TSMG The leverage resets every day. Hold longer and compounding takes over, so multi-day results can drift well away from twice TSM's move, especially in choppy markets.leverageshares.com
  • One stock, one industry. Everything rides on Taiwan Semiconductor, doubled, so company-specific news lands twice as hard.
  • Young and small: launched in January 2025, and it sits among the smaller, less heavily traded names on the leveraged shelf, which can widen spreads.

Full AMZG profile⁠

Full TSMG profile⁠

AMZG vs TSMG Holdings

How AMZG and TSMG differ

Overlap by weight

11.0%

Shared holdings make up 14.1% of AMZG and 11.0% of TSMG.

About this figure: AMZG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

TSMG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both11.0%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for AMZG and TSMG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AMZG and TSMG, widest gap first
CountryMore in AMZGMore in TSMGGap
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AMZG214.0%
  • TSMG211.0%

Securities held

  • AMZG1
  • TSMG2

Asset class

AMZG
Stocks
TSMG
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in AMZG0
  • In both1
  • Only in TSMG1

Only in AMZG

0 securities, 0.0% of AMZG by weight

Only in TSMG

1 security, 10.1% of TSMG by weight

  • 874039100 Swp10.06%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AMZG and TSMG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AMZGMore in TSMGGap
First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040AMZG +3.09 points

All 4 AMZG holdings⁠All 6 TSMG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AMZG vs TSMG Cost

Overpaying TSMG vs AMZG

$174

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AMZG 0.75%

    $14,482

  • TSMG 0.76%

    $14,656

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AMZG 0.75%
  • TSMG 0.76%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530TSMG $14,656AMZG $14,482

Year by year

YearAMZGTSMGOverpaying
10$1,336$1,353$17
20$5,078$5,142$64
30$14,482$14,656$174

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%AMZG, cheaper
  • 0.76%TSMG
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

AMZG 87th cheapest of 312 funds

TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds

AMZG vs TSMG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
AMZG None
TSMG No data
Last payment
AMZG No data
TSMG $2.73
Ex-dividend
AMZG No data
TSMG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
AMZG No data
TSMG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
AMZG No data
TSMG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

AMZGAll AMZG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TSMGIrregular · 1 paymentAll TSMG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $2.73. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502026YTD

AMZG vs TSMG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AMZG No dataTSMG 77.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AMZG No dataTSMG 0.97since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AMZG No dataTSMG −63.7%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AMZG −0.15TSMG 3.98

Popular comparisons

  • AMZGCvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSMGAvsUNHGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMZGCvsCOTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSMGAvsCOTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.77%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AMZGCvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TSMGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.76% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.