COSW ranks 4th and AMZW 7th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AMZW vs COSW
COSW −0.01pt a year
1.00%0.99%
AMZW 5.1×the volume
16.9K3.32K
AMZW vs COSW Performance
+5.9%+14.0%
- AMZW 1.00%
- COSW 0.99%, better
- AMZW $36M
- COSW $12M
- AMZW +5.9%
- COSW +14.0%, better
- AMZW 39.77%, better
- COSW 26.81%
- AMZW 4
- COSW 4
- AMZW 16.9K sh, better
- COSW 3.32K sh
- AMZW $34.55
- COSW $42.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZW | COSW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | B63 | A95Higher |
| Risk | B63 | A77Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | B62Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B68Higher | D35 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AMZW and COSW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZWB
COSWB
In short
AMZW A weekly paycheck stapled to Amazon. AMZW's stated aim is to pay distributions every week while targeting 1.2 times AMZN's calendar-week total return before fees and expenses. Fee: 1.00%, no waiver.
COSW Costco with the volume dial set to 1.2, plus a paycheck. COSW targets 1.2 times Costco stock's calendar-week return and is built to distribute weekly, a gentler multiple in a category that usually starts at 2x.
Stated mandate
AMZW The Fund primarily seeks to pay weekly distributions and secondarily targets approximately 1.2 times Amazon’s calendar-week total return, before fees and expenses.
COSW COSW seeks weekly shareholder distributions and targets calendar-week returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 1.2 times the total return of Costco common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZW vs COSW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZW vs COSW Cost
Overpaying AMZW vs COSW
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZW 1.00%
$18,688
COSW 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZW | COSW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,746 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,565 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,525 | $163 |
- 1.00%AMZW
- 0.99%COSW, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
COSW 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
AMZW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AMZW vs COSW Dividends
- AMZW 39.77%, better
- COSW 26.81%
- AMZW $14.24
- COSW $11.37
- AMZW $0.16
- COSW $0.20
- AMZW Nov 9, 2026
- COSW Nov 9, 2026
- AMZW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- COSW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- AMZW Weekly
- COSW Weekly
Distribution history
AMZW vs COSW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZW 41.5%COSW 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZW 0.16COSW 0.33
- Worst fall
- AMZW −26.8%COSW −22.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZW 2.20COSW 0.13
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.