AAPW ranks 1st and COSW 5th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs COSW
COSW −0.01pt a year
1.00%0.99%
AAPW 4.4×the volume
14K3.18K
AAPW vs COSW Performance
+28.3%+9.4%
- AAPW 1.00%
- COSW 0.99%, better
- AAPW $44M
- COSW $11M
- AAPW +28.3%, better
- COSW +9.4%
- AAPW 26.59%
- COSW
- AAPW 5
- COSW 4
- AAPW 14K sh, better
- COSW 3.18K sh
- AAPW $41.43
- COSW $40.61
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | COSW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A88 | A95Higher |
| Risk | A84Higher | A73 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | C46 |
| Holdings | C45Higher | D34 |
| Durability | B66Higher | D35 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and COSW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
COSWB
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
COSW Costco with the volume dial set to 1.2, plus a paycheck. COSW targets 1.2 times Costco stock's calendar-week return and is built to distribute weekly, a gentler multiple in a category that usually starts at 2x.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
COSW COSW seeks weekly shareholder distributions and targets calendar-week returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 1.2 times the total return of Costco common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs COSW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs COSW Cost
Overpaying AAPW vs COSW
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
COSW 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | COSW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,746 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,565 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,525 | $163 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 0.99%COSW, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
COSW 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs COSW Dividends
- AAPW 26.59%
- COSW
- AAPW $11.02
- COSW
- AAPW $0.24
- COSW $0.22
- AAPW Oct 26, 2026
- COSW Oct 26, 2026
- AAPW Oct 27, 2026
- COSW Oct 27, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- COSW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs COSW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%COSW 23.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76COSW 0.33
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%COSW −22.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 1.02COSW 0.13
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.