SCYB ranks 2nd and ANGL 20th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
ANGL vs SCYB
SCYB −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCYB 1.2×the volume
905K1.1M
SCYB +0.7pt
+7.0%+7.7%
ANGL vs SCYB Performance
0.0%+2.0%
- ANGL 0.25%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- ANGL $2.98B
- SCYB $2.8B
- ANGL 0.0%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- ANGL 7.56%
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- ANGL 132
- SCYB 1844
- ANGL 905K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- ANGL $27.63
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ANGL | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A79 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F21 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | A78 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | D33 | A99Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. ANGL and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ANGLB
SCYBA
In short
ANGL Junk bonds with a pedigree. ANGL holds US dollar corporate bonds that were investment grade at issue and got downgraded later, a rules-based slice of high yield running since 2012 at a quarter-percent fee.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
ANGL The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of an index of U.S.-dollar corporate bonds that were investment grade when issued but later became below investment grade.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ANGL vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ANGL vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying ANGL vs SCYB
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ANGL 0.25%
$5,159
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ANGL | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%ANGL
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
ANGL 18th cheapest of 84 funds
ANGL vs SCYB Dividends
- ANGL 7.56%
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- ANGL $2.08
- SCYB $1.96
- ANGL $0.17
- SCYB $0.16
- ANGL Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- ANGL Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- ANGL Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
ANGL vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ANGL 6.1%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ANGL 0.53SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- ANGL −19.3%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ANGL 0.80SCYB 0.28
ANGL and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
