AOA ranks 2nd and GLDB 36th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs GLDB
AOA −0.81pt a year
0.15%0.96%
AOA 11.0×the volume
135K12.2K
AOA vs GLDB Performance
+10.1%−19.1%
- AOA 0.15%, better
- GLDB 0.96%
- AOA $3.32B
- GLDB $36M
- AOA +10.1%, better
- GLDB −19.1%
- AOA 2.19%
- GLDB
- AOA 34240
- GLDB 10
- AOA 135K sh, better
- GLDB 12.2K sh
- AOA $96.21
- GLDB $19.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | GLDB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B55Higher | F5 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | D29 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | A98Higher | F24 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and GLDB are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
GLDBF
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
GLDB Gold and bitcoin in one wrapper, geared to roughly 1.25x and re-tilted weekly by rules instead of hunches. It is the anti-fiat trade as a single ticker, priced at 0.96% a year.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
GLDB The Fund seeks capital appreciation through dynamic exposure to Bitcoin and gold, with possible smaller allocations to related cryptocurrency and precious-metal exposures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs GLDB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs GLDB Cost
Overpaying GLDB vs AOA
$14,897
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
GLDB 0.96%
$18,034
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | GLDB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,695 | $1,421 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $6,383 | $5,312 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $18,034 | $14,897 |
- 0.15%AOA, cheaper
- 0.96%GLDB
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
GLDB 31st cheapest of 37 funds
AOA vs GLDB Dividends
- AOA 2.19%
- GLDB
- AOA $2.11
- GLDB
- AOA $0.30
- GLDB $0.05
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- GLDB Dec 23, 2025
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- GLDB Dec 24, 2025
- AOA Quarterly
- GLDB Irregular
Distribution history
AOA vs GLDB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%GLDB 33.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37GLDB −0.60
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%GLDB −38.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06GLDB 0.63
AOA and GLDB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.96% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
