AOA ranks 2nd and HECA 26th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs HECA
AOA −0.66pt a year
0.15%0.81%
AOA 1.9×the volume
143K75.5K
AOA vs HECA Performance
+9.4%−3.2%
- AOA 0.15%, better
- HECA 0.81%
- AOA $3.26B
- HECA $205M
- AOA +9.4%, better
- HECA −3.2%
- AOA 2.23%
- HECA
- AOA 34511
- HECA 14
- AOA 143K sh, better
- HECA 75.5K sh
- AOA $94.55
- HECA $26.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | HECA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B63 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D25 |
| Durability | A98Higher | C44 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and HECA are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
HECAC
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
HECA A research shop's macro call, wrapped in an ETF. Hedgeye actively shifts among stocks, bonds, commodities and currencies (mostly via other ETFs) and writes a 15% peak-to-trough NAV drawdown limit into its own objective, which the prospectus does not guarantee.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
HECA The Fund actively allocates among equities, bonds and other debt instruments, commodities, and currencies, primarily through ETFs. It seeks to maximize returns over rolling 12-month periods while limiting peak-to-trough NAV declines to 15%, without guaranteeing that outcome.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs HECA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs HECA Cost
Overpaying HECA vs AOA
$12,381
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
HECA 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | HECA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,439 | $1,165 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $5,456 | $4,385 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $15,518 | $12,381 |
- 0.15%AOA, cheaper
- 0.81%HECA
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 36 funds
HECA 26th cheapest of 36 funds
AOA vs HECA Dividends
- AOA 2.23%
- HECA
- AOA $2.11
- HECA
- AOA $0.30
- HECA $0.56
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- HECA Dec 30, 2025
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- HECA Dec 31, 2025
- AOA Quarterly
- HECA Irregular
Distribution history
AOA vs HECA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%HECA 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37HECA 0.22
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%HECA −13.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06HECA 0.10
AOA and HECA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
