IRTR ranks 3rd and HECA 26th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
HECA vs IRTR
IRTR −0.73pt a year
0.81%0.08%
HECA 6.0×the volume
75.5K12.6K
HECA vs IRTR Performance
−3.2%+5.2%
- HECA 0.81%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- HECA $205M
- IRTR $59M
- HECA −3.2%
- IRTR +5.2%, better
- HECA
- IRTR 3.21%
- HECA 14
- IRTR 29136
- HECA 75.5K sh, better
- IRTR 12.6K sh
- HECA $26.63
- IRTR $31.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HECA | IRTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D28 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B63 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D25 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | D25 | A79Higher |
| Durability | C44 | B56Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. HECA and IRTR are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HECAC
IRTRA
In short
HECA A research shop's macro call, wrapped in an ETF. Hedgeye actively shifts among stocks, bonds, commodities and currencies (mostly via other ETFs) and writes a 15% peak-to-trough NAV drawdown limit into its own objective, which the prospectus does not guarantee.
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
Stated mandate
HECA The Fund actively allocates among equities, bonds and other debt instruments, commodities, and currencies, primarily through ETFs. It seeks to maximize returns over rolling 12-month periods while limiting peak-to-trough NAV declines to 15%, without guaranteeing that outcome.
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HECA vs IRTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HECA vs IRTR Cost
Overpaying HECA vs IRTR
$13,829
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HECA 0.81%
$15,518
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HECA | IRTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,439 | $147 | $1,292 |
| 20 | $5,456 | $575 | $4,881 |
| 30 | $15,518 | $1,689 | $13,829 |
- 0.81%HECA
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 36 funds
HECA 26th cheapest of 36 funds
HECA vs IRTR Dividends
- HECA
- IRTR 3.21%
- HECA
- IRTR $1.00
- HECA $0.56
- IRTR $0.07
- HECA Dec 30, 2025
- IRTR Nov 3, 2026
- HECA Dec 31, 2025
- IRTR Nov 6, 2026
- HECA Irregular
- IRTR Monthly
Distribution history
HECA vs IRTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HECA 12.3%IRTR 7.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- HECA 0.22IRTR 1.14
- Worst fall
- HECA −13.9%IRTR −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- HECA 0.10IRTR 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.81% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.