AOA ranks 2nd and LCR 21st of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs LCR
AOA −0.68pt a year
0.15%0.83%
AOA 27.2×the volume
135K4.95K
AOA +1.7pt
+8.2%+6.5%
AOA vs LCR Performance
+48.2%+37.2%
- AOA 0.15%, better
- LCR 0.83%
- AOA $3.32B
- LCR $66M
- AOA +10.1%, better
- LCR +7.7%
- AOA 2.19%, better
- LCR 1.29%
- AOA 34240
- LCR 34
- AOA 135K sh, better
- LCR 4.95K sh
- AOA $96.21
- LCR $40.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | LCR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A77 |
| Risk | B55 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | B55 |
| Durability | A98Higher | B55 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and LCR are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
LCRC
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
LCR Leuthold has sold tactical asset allocation to institutions since the 1980s. LCR packs that discipline into an ETF of ETFs that slides between stocks, bonds and alternatives on a quantitative read.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
LCR The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income, described as total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs LCR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs LCR Cost
Overpaying LCR vs AOA
$12,722
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
LCR 0.83%
$15,859
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | LCR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,474 | $1,200 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $5,581 | $4,510 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $15,859 | $12,722 |
- 0.15%AOA, cheaper
- 0.83%LCR
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
LCR 28th cheapest of 37 funds
AOA vs LCR Dividends
- AOA 2.19%, better
- LCR 1.29%
- AOA $2.11
- LCR $0.52
- AOA $0.30
- LCR $0.52
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- LCR Dec 11, 2025
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- LCR Dec 12, 2025
- AOA Quarterly
- LCR Annual
Distribution history
AOA vs LCR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AOA
- LCR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%LCR 7.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37, betterLCR 0.98
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%LCR −13.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06LCR 0.77
AOA and LCR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
