INCE ranks 4th and LCR 21st of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
INCE vs LCR
INCE −0.54pt a year
0.29%0.83%
INCE 9.6×the volume
47.3K4.95K
INCE +4.1pt
+10.6%+6.5%
INCE vs LCR Performance
+65.8%+37.2%
- INCE 0.29%, better
- LCR 0.83%
- INCE $368M
- LCR $66M
- INCE +22.6%, better
- LCR +7.7%
- INCE 5.28%, better
- LCR 1.29%
- INCE 112
- LCR 34
- INCE 47.3K sh, better
- LCR 4.95K sh
- INCE $68.80
- LCR $40.39
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INCE | LCR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | D25 |
| Mission | A77 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B55 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B55 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. INCE and LCR are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INCEA
LCRC
In short
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
LCR Leuthold has sold tactical asset allocation to institutions since the 1980s. LCR packs that discipline into an ETF of ETFs that slides between stocks, bonds and alternatives on a quantitative read.
Stated mandate
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
LCR The Fund seeks capital appreciation and income, described as total return.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INCE vs LCR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INCE vs LCR Cost
Overpaying LCR vs INCE
$9,907
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
LCR 0.83%
$15,859
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INCE | LCR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $1,474 | $947 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $5,581 | $3,537 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $15,859 | $9,907 |
- 0.29%INCE, cheaper
- 0.83%LCR
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds
LCR 28th cheapest of 37 funds
INCE vs LCR Dividends
- INCE 5.28%, better
- LCR 1.29%
- INCE $3.64
- LCR $0.52
- INCE $0.30
- LCR $0.52
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- LCR Dec 11, 2025
- INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
- LCR Dec 12, 2025
- INCE Monthly
- LCR Annual
Distribution history
INCE vs LCR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- INCE
- LCR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INCE 10.8%LCR 7.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- INCE 1.28, betterLCR 0.98
- Worst fall
- INCE −18.4%LCR −13.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- INCE 0.60LCR 0.77
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.83% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.