AOA ranks 2nd and MHIG 26th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs MHIG
AOA −0.40pt a year
0.15%0.55%
AOA 1153.6×the volume
143K124
AOA vs MHIG Performance
−2.6%+2.3%
- AOA 0.15%, better
- MHIG 0.55%
- AOA $3.26B
- MHIG $1M
- AOA +11.7%
- MHIG
- AOA 2.18%
- MHIG
- AOA 34522
- MHIG 87
- AOA 143K sh, better
- MHIG 124 sh
- AOA $94.55
- MHIG $20.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | MHIG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | C53 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C53 |
| Risk | C53 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | F24 |
| Durability | A98Higher | F22 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and MHIG are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
MHIGC
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
MHIG Most of the health care aisle bets on drug and device stocks. MHIG aims at the bill instead, seeking returns that match the U.S. healthcare cost inflation rate through a quant-selected mix of equities, debt and commodities.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
MHIG The Fund seeks returns that generally match the U.S. healthcare cost inflation rate. It uses a combination of healthcare-related equities, debt, commodities, and other instruments selected through a proprietary quantitative model.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs MHIG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs MHIG Cost
Overpaying MHIG vs AOA
$7,767
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
MHIG 0.55%
$10,904
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | MHIG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $988 | $714 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,790 | $2,719 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $10,904 | $7,767 |
- 0.15%AOA, cheaper
- 0.55%MHIG
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.61%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 36 funds
MHIG 16th cheapest of 36 funds
AOA vs MHIG Dividends
- AOA 2.18%
- MHIG
- AOA $2.11
- MHIG None
- AOA $0.30
- MHIG
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- MHIG
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- MHIG
- AOA Quarterly
- MHIG
Distribution history
AOA vs MHIG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%MHIG
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37MHIG
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%MHIG
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06MHIG 0.33
AOA and MHIG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
