Skip to content

MHIG vs UCBG

Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF

MHIGCNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

UCBGANYSE Arca

Overlap

8.9%by weight

Expense ratio

UCBG −0.49pt a year

MHIG0.55%UCBG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

UCBG 33478.7×the volume

MHIG124UCBG4.15M

MHIG vs UCBG Performance

Oct 9, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026

+3.0%MHIG−2.9%UCBG

Oct 9, 2026 to Nov 9, 2026. MHIG +3.0%. UCBG −2.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%0%2%Oct 9Oct 23Nov 9
Expense ratio
MHIG 0.55%
UCBG 0.06%, better
Fund size
MHIG $1M
UCBG $2.42B
Holdings
MHIG 87
UCBG 886
Avg volume (30D)
MHIG 124 sh
UCBG 4.15M sh, better
NAV per share
MHIG $20.41
UCBG $48.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

MHIG: Cost 53, Risk 72, Mission 53, Tradability 23, Holdings 24, Durability 22. UCBG: Cost 100, Risk not scored, Mission 99, Tradability 99, Holdings 79, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for MHIG, UCBG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarMHIGUCBG
Cost30% weightC53A100Higher
Mission25% weightC53A99Higher
Risk15% weightA72Not scored
Tradability15% weightF23A99Higher
Holdings10% weightF24A79Higher
Durability5% weightF22B66Higher

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. MHIG and UCBG are both graded against the same 36 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 36 funds
See all 36 ›

UCBG ranks 1st and MHIG 26th of 36 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 26CHECAHedgeye Capital Allocation ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 26CMHIGMilliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 28DWTIPWisdomTree Inflation Plus FundScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

MHIGCMilliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF

UCBGAState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

In short

MHIG Most of the health care aisle bets on drug and device stocks. MHIG aims at the bill instead, seeking returns that match the U.S. healthcare cost inflation rate through a quant-selected mix of equities, debt and commodities.

UCBG No data

Stated mandate

MHIG The Fund seeks returns that generally match the U.S. healthcare cost inflation rate. It uses a combination of healthcare-related equities, debt, commodities, and other instruments selected through a proprietary quantitative model.

UCBG No data

Why people hold it

  • MHIG The benchmark is a rate, not a stock index: the fund seeks returns that generally match the U.S. healthcare cost inflation rate.
  • Multi-asset by design: healthcare equities, debt, commodities and other instruments picked by a quantitative model, not a cap-weighted ladder of big pharma.
  • A genuinely unusual mandate in a cohort where the best-regarded names (VHT, FHLC, XLV) are all cap-weighted US healthcare equity index funds.
  • Standard 1940 Act ETF wrapper with a US focus, so the plumbing is conventional even though the strategy is not.

UCBG No data

Worth knowing

  • MHIG At 0.55% it sits above the health care cohort median of 0.50%, and far above plain index trackers such as VHT (0.09%) and XLV (0.08%).
  • Launched in 2026, so the track record is short, and the selection model is proprietary: you get the holdings, not the recipe.
  • Small and thinly traded next to the aisle's heavyweights, which means spreads and execution costs carry more weight.

UCBG No data

Full MHIG profile⁠

Full UCBG profile⁠

MHIG vs UCBG Holdings

How MHIG and UCBG differ

Overlap by weight

8.9%

Shared holdings make up 29.4% of MHIG and 9.2% of UCBG.

Level by level

  • Holdings55 in both8.9%
  • Sector12 Sectors19.8%
  • Countryby domicile96.0%

Sector

Sector weights in MHIG and UCBG, widest gap first
SectorMore in MHIGMore in UCBGGap
GovernmentMHIG +66.3 points
TechnologyUCBG +34.3 points
Health CareMHIG +13.8 points
FinancialsUCBG +10.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryUCBG +8.2 points
CommunicationUCBG +7.5 points
IndustrialsUCBG +6.8 points
Consumer StaplesUCBG +4.4 points
EnergyUCBG +3.5 points
UtilitiesUCBG +1.9 points
Real EstateUCBG +1.6 points
MaterialsUCBG +1.4 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in MHIG and UCBG, widest gap first
CountryMore in MHIGMore in UCBGGap
United StatesMHIG +4.0 points
IrelandUCBG +1.2 points
United KingdomUCBG +0.9 points
Other countries (17)UCBG +1.8 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • MHIG81.6%
  • UCBG33.7%

Securities held

  • MHIG85
  • UCBG884

Asset class

MHIG
Stocks
UCBG
Multi-Asset

Holdings

  • Only in MHIG30
  • In both55
  • Only in UCBG829

Only in MHIG

30 securities, 70.4% of MHIG by weight

  • BondBloxx Bloomberg Five Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF23.13%
  • United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202620.11%
  • BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF16.85%

Only in UCBG

829 securities, 90.6% of UCBG by weight

  • Apple Inc7.04%
  • NVIDIA Corp6.36%
  • Microsoft Corp5.55%

Weight gaps

All 55 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in MHIG and UCBG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in MHIGMore in UCBGGap
Eli Lilly & CoLLYMHIG +4.57 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJMHIG +2.34 points
Gilead Sciences IncGILDMHIG +1.05 points
AbbVie IncABBVMHIG +1.04 points
Thermo Fisher Scientific IncTMOMHIG +0.87 points
Amgen IncAMGNMHIG +0.78 points
Danaher CorpDHRMHIG +0.70 points
McKesson CorpMCKMHIG +0.66 points

All 87 MHIG holdings⁠All 503 UCBG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

MHIG vs UCBG Cost

Overpaying MHIG vs UCBG

$9,634

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • MHIG 0.55%

    $10,904

  • UCBG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • MHIG 0.55%
  • UCBG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530MHIG $10,904UCBG $1,270

Year by year

YearMHIGUCBGOverpaying
10$988$110$878
20$3,790$432$3,358
30$10,904$1,270$9,634

Expense ratio

  • 0.55%MHIG
  • 0.06%UCBG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.61%

UCBG cheapest of 36 funds

MHIG 16th cheapest of 36 funds

MHIG vs UCBG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
MHIG None
UCBG No data
Last payment
MHIG No data
UCBG $0.04
Ex-dividend
MHIG No data
UCBG Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
MHIG No data
UCBG Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
MHIG No data
UCBG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

MHIGAll MHIG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UCBGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UCBG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2026 YTD. Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD

MHIG vs UCBG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
MHIG 0.33UCBG 0.00

MHIG and UCBG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • MHIGCvsAOAA

    Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsAOAA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MHIGCvsIRTRA

    Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsIRTRA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MHIGCvsINCEA

    Milliman Healthcare Inflation Guard ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.55% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • UCBGAvsINCEA

    State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.