AOA ranks 2nd and OCIO 12th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
AOA vs OCIO
AOA −0.50pt a year
0.15%0.65%
AOA 51.4×the volume
135K2.62K
AOA +1.7pt
+8.2%+6.5%
AOA vs OCIO Performance
+48.2%+37.0%
- AOA 0.15%, better
- OCIO 0.65%
- AOA $3.32B
- OCIO $168M
- AOA +10.1%, better
- OCIO +8.1%
- AOA 2.19%
- OCIO 9.49%, better
- AOA 34240
- OCIO 62
- AOA 135K sh, better
- OCIO 2.62K sh
- AOA $96.21
- OCIO $36.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOA | OCIO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A93Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A92 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A81 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A98Higher | B67 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. AOA and OCIO are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOAA
OCIOB
In short
AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.
OCIO Endowment boards hire an outsourced CIO to run the money. OCIO bottles that idea in an ETF: an active, go-anywhere basket of other ETFs that seeks to outperform a plain global 60/40, for 0.65% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.
OCIO The Fund seeks to outperform a traditional 60/40 portfolio of global equities and fixed-income investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOA vs OCIO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOA vs OCIO Cost
Overpaying OCIO vs AOA
$9,580
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOA 0.15%
$3,137
OCIO 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOA | OCIO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,163 | $889 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $4,440 | $3,369 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $12,717 | $9,580 |
- 0.15%AOA, cheaper
- 0.65%OCIO
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
AOA 3rd cheapest of 37 funds
OCIO 20th cheapest of 37 funds
AOA vs OCIO Dividends
- AOA 2.19%
- OCIO 9.49%, better
- AOA $2.11
- OCIO $3.51
- AOA $0.30
- OCIO $0.11
- AOA Oct 2, 2026
- OCIO Sep 29, 2026
- AOA Oct 7, 2026
- OCIO Sep 30, 2026
- AOA Quarterly
- OCIO Quarterly
Distribution history
AOA vs OCIO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AOA
- OCIO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOA 9.6%OCIO 8.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AOA 1.37, betterOCIO 1.09
- Worst fall
- AOA −23.6%OCIO −17.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AOA 1.06OCIO 0.84
AOA and OCIO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
