IRTR ranks 3rd and OCIO 12th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
IRTR vs OCIO
IRTR −0.57pt a year
0.08%0.65%
IRTR 4.9×the volume
12.7K2.62K
OCIO +1.0pt
+13.1%+14.1%
IRTR vs OCIO Performance
+5.1%+8.1%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- OCIO 0.65%
- IRTR $60M
- OCIO $168M
- IRTR +5.1%
- OCIO +8.1%, better
- IRTR 3.17%
- OCIO 9.49%, better
- IRTR 29140
- OCIO 62
- IRTR 12.7K sh, better
- OCIO 2.62K sh
- IRTR $31.52
- OCIO $36.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRTR | OCIO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A92 |
| Risk | A82Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A80 | A83Higher |
| Durability | B56 | B67Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. IRTR and OCIO are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRTRA
OCIOB
In short
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
OCIO Endowment boards hire an outsourced CIO to run the money. OCIO bottles that idea in an ETF: an active, go-anywhere basket of other ETFs that seeks to outperform a plain global 60/40, for 0.65% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
OCIO The Fund seeks to outperform a traditional 60/40 portfolio of global equities and fixed-income investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRTR vs OCIO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRTR vs OCIO Cost
Overpaying OCIO vs IRTR
$11,028
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
OCIO 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRTR | OCIO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $1,163 | $1,016 |
| 20 | $575 | $4,440 | $3,865 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $12,717 | $11,028 |
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- 0.65%OCIO
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
OCIO 20th cheapest of 37 funds
IRTR vs OCIO Dividends
- IRTR 3.17%
- OCIO 9.49%, better
- IRTR $1.00
- OCIO $3.51
- IRTR $0.08
- OCIO $0.11
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- OCIO Sep 29, 2026
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- OCIO Sep 30, 2026
- IRTR Monthly
- OCIO Quarterly
Distribution history
IRTR vs OCIO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRTR 7.3%, betterOCIO 8.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- IRTR 1.14, betterOCIO 1.09
- Worst fall
- IRTR −6.3%OCIO −17.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IRTR 0.47OCIO 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.